2002
DOI: 10.1080/0966369022000003905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Care of the Subject: Feminism and Critiques of GIS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0
6

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
71
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…These GIS scholars agreed with many of the critiques of GIS, but disagreed that the criticism necessitated such a division in the discipline (see Flowerdew 1998, Hanson 2002, Schuurman and Pratt 2002. Instead they sought to show how GIS could be used for feminist inquiry within geography, public health, political science, and other academic disciplines.…”
Section: Feminism and Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These GIS scholars agreed with many of the critiques of GIS, but disagreed that the criticism necessitated such a division in the discipline (see Flowerdew 1998, Hanson 2002, Schuurman and Pratt 2002. Instead they sought to show how GIS could be used for feminist inquiry within geography, public health, political science, and other academic disciplines.…”
Section: Feminism and Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human geographers are critical of predictive modeling for ignoring subjectivities inherent in the data represented (see Schuurman 2002, Schuurman andPratt 2002). GIS creates visualizations that appear to have mutually exclusive categories of data because data entered is categorically conclusive and uncontestable in its representative form within a GIS.…”
Section: Feminism and Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It follows Newton who views spatiality as absolute conceptualizations, representing space as independent spatial features (e.g., discrete vector features or raster cells), rather than Einstein and Leibnitz who view space as relational [31]. Therefore, traditional GIS has often been criticized for its inadequacy in representing relational spaces of social power and subjective differences among its analyzed objects [26,32]. It lacks the power to enable researchers to understand neighborhood-level knowledge about the lived experiences of local people, or social ties and attachments of local people to their communities [33].…”
Section: Vgi For Satisfying the Information Diversity Requirement Of Ipmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the concern is that researchers will make inappropriately generalized truth claims based on their specific perceptual experiences (Abu-Lughod 1999; Schuurman and Pratt 2002). Law (1999), for example, emphasized that although feminist-inspired scholarship on mobility has made female urban movement more visible (cf.…”
Section: Problems With Walking: (In)validity and (Un)reflexivitymentioning
confidence: 99%