2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2014.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discontinuous Galerkin finite element scheme for a conserved higher-order traffic flow model by exploring Riemann solvers

Abstract: The discontinuous Galerkin (DG) scheme is used to solve a conserved higherorder (CHO) traffic flow model by exploring several Riemann solvers. The second-order accurate DG scheme is found to be adequate in that the accuracy is comparable to the weighted essentially non-oscillatory (WENO) scheme with fifth-order accuracy and much better than the scheme with first-order accuracy in resolving a wide moving jam with a shock profile. Moreover, it considerably reduces the differences between the proposed solvers in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To ensure the same order of accuracy, all integrals are computed by the Gauss formula with sufficiently high accuracy (e.g., the two-point formula for k = 1). We refer the reader to [2,10,15,20,29] for general account of the formulation.…”
Section: General Account Of Dg Space Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure the same order of accuracy, all integrals are computed by the Gauss formula with sufficiently high accuracy (e.g., the two-point formula for k = 1). We refer the reader to [2,10,15,20,29] for general account of the formulation.…”
Section: General Account Of Dg Space Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are broadly classified into upwind and central schemes depending on the final projection step. Upwind schemes employ Riemann solvers to resolve discontinuity at cell interfaces, this requires characteristic information of the wave propagation at the discontinuity (Riemann fans), often resulting in a complex and expensive upwind algorithm (see for example [15,17,22]). Where as the central schemes do not require characteristic decomposition or expensive Riemann solvers, and the projection is done by averaging over the Riemann fans [23], nevertheless, the central schemes are dissipative but computationally inexpensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%