Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10494-013-9482-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Pipe Flow at Moderately High Reynolds Numbers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
174
3
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
29
174
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…turbulence intensity u /U, skewness S and flatness F, of the streamwise velocity component, as a function of the Reynolds number, are shown in figure 3b, where the prime denotes the root mean square value (RMS). The Reynolds-number invariance found for the skewness and flatness at the centreline is in accordance with findings from the Superpipe [5] as well as low Re pipe flow DNSs, which 'show nearly constant values with S ≈ −0.48 and F ≈ 3.4' [42]. The inner-scaled streamwise RMS values are also almost Re independent for low Re DNSs [42], which, together with U + CL ∝ ln R + , result in a decrease in the turbulence intensity, which agrees qualitatively with the present as well as the Superpipe data.…”
Section: (A) Centreline Turbulence Quantitiessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…turbulence intensity u /U, skewness S and flatness F, of the streamwise velocity component, as a function of the Reynolds number, are shown in figure 3b, where the prime denotes the root mean square value (RMS). The Reynolds-number invariance found for the skewness and flatness at the centreline is in accordance with findings from the Superpipe [5] as well as low Re pipe flow DNSs, which 'show nearly constant values with S ≈ −0.48 and F ≈ 3.4' [42]. The inner-scaled streamwise RMS values are also almost Re independent for low Re DNSs [42], which, together with U + CL ∝ ln R + , result in a decrease in the turbulence intensity, which agrees qualitatively with the present as well as the Superpipe data.…”
Section: (A) Centreline Turbulence Quantitiessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The grid nearest the centerline contains a cylindrical region with a stretched Cartesian grid, similar to the grid used for a DNS of pipe flow in Nek5000 (El-Khoury et al 2013). In the present grid, this region contains 128 elements over the axial cross-section, and extends from r = 0 to the outer radius of the inner pipe at r = 0.14, where it attaches to an outer cylindrical grid.…”
Section: Nonlinear Simulations and Podmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, higher compression ratios imply smaller file sizes. Figure 3 illustrates the behavior of the DLT truncation on a test case, namely the turbulent flow through a straight pipe, which is further described in Section 4 and in [14]. In this figure we also show the compression-ratio results obtained by using the DCT, as in our previous work [19].…”
Section: Description Of the Compression Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The first case under consideration is the turbulent flow through a smooth straight pipe, obtained through a fully-resolved DNS by El Khoury et al [14]. Although this is one of the three main canonical flow cases in wall-bounded turbulence, it has not been investigated numerically as thoroughly as channels [21,22] or zero-pressure-gradient boundary layers [23,24], due to the numerical problems associated with the singularity at the pipe center.…”
Section: Summary Of Test Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation