2017
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reynolds stress scaling in pipe flow turbulence—first results from CICLoPE

Abstract: One contribution of 14 to a theme issue 'Toward the development of high-fidelity models of wall turbulence at large Reynolds number' .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
4
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The similarity of the profiles sustains until the point FST cases peel up with the intense wall-normal fluctuations due to the presence of turbulence in the free stream. It has been shown in the literature for high Reynolds number flows that the wall-normal fluctuations exhibit a nearly constant extended plateau [22][23][24]. It is worth mentioning that the analogy of the turbulent boundary layer flows under the effect of FST with high Re flows, which is detailed in Dogan et al [5,6], is further supported here with the plateau region observed in the wall-normal variance profiles.…”
Section: A Wall-normal Velocitysupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The similarity of the profiles sustains until the point FST cases peel up with the intense wall-normal fluctuations due to the presence of turbulence in the free stream. It has been shown in the literature for high Reynolds number flows that the wall-normal fluctuations exhibit a nearly constant extended plateau [22][23][24]. It is worth mentioning that the analogy of the turbulent boundary layer flows under the effect of FST with high Re flows, which is detailed in Dogan et al [5,6], is further supported here with the plateau region observed in the wall-normal variance profiles.…”
Section: A Wall-normal Velocitysupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The choice of only some data used here does not affect the accuracy of the findings. The same conclusions apply to all the pipe-flow results of Örlü et al [47] and Furuichi et al [39], and to the boundary layer measurements of Bailey et al [43] with R τ 6000, although it is expected that difficulties will arise because of the evaluation of the mean velocity gradient for experimental data, which introduce a large scatter.…”
Section: A Logarithmic Mean Velocity Lawsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…This allows construction of a one-to-one relationship between the flow velocity and the anemometer output voltage. Although this means that calibration is not performed in a near-potential flow, the ratio u 2 /U at the centreline is sufficiently small to make insignificant differences to the potential flow calibration (Monty 2005;Örlü et al 2017). An intermediate calibration relationship between the hot-wire voltages and velocities is generated for each wall-normal point during the measurement, based on an assumption that deviations between pre-and post-calibration curves are the result of a linear drift in the hot-wire voltage with time.…”
Section: Flow Typementioning
confidence: 99%