2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct comparison of selected methods for genetic categorisation of Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium hominis species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
110
3
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
13
110
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The typing methods used in this study enabled investigation of a vast number of specimens with very little loss in resolution [22]. Potential mis-identifications in the COWP assay that are currently known include the Cryptosporidium rabbit genotype confounding for C. hominis [6] and the mouse genotype mistaken for C. parvum [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The typing methods used in this study enabled investigation of a vast number of specimens with very little loss in resolution [22]. Potential mis-identifications in the COWP assay that are currently known include the Cryptosporidium rabbit genotype confounding for C. hominis [6] and the mouse genotype mistaken for C. parvum [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because their sequences had higher intraspecific variation than the ribosomal RNA gene regions (Morgan et al, 1999b), it was suggested that other Cryptosporidium genes targets should be used for amplification including the Cryptosporidium oocyst wall protein (COWP), 16S rRNA, Hsp70, Actin, β-Tubulin, gp60, microsatellites, minisatellites and extrachromosomal double-stranded RNA (Xiao et al, 2004;Caccio et al, 2005;Coklin et al, 2007). As well as the Internal Transcribed Spacers (ITS) of ribosomal DNA were useful for the detection of genetic variability within species (Chalmers et al, 2005;Schindler et al, 2005). Synchronized analysis of the obtained morphological simultaneous with molecular criteria of Cryptosporidium buffalo's oocytes in the present study could prove that the isolates were C. parvum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IIaA15G2R1 subtype was reported in three lambs linked to a human infection in the UK (Chalmers et al 2005). Recently, sheep have also been implicated as a potential source for human C. ubiquitum infections in the UK by gp60 subtyping .…”
Section: R Y P T O S P O R I D I U M S P E C I E S I N a N I M A L Smentioning
confidence: 99%