2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67946-4_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensions of Semantic Similarity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that since no single similarity measure was determined to be best (see Section 5), the comparison process involved each considered similarity measure (i.e., separate ranking for score, separate ranking for degree, etc.). Obviously, an attempt to create a combined similarity measure could have been undertaken (e.g., following the discussion found in [92]). However, this is outside the scope of this contribution.…”
Section: Extracting Common Entities From Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We note that since no single similarity measure was determined to be best (see Section 5), the comparison process involved each considered similarity measure (i.e., separate ranking for score, separate ranking for degree, etc.). Obviously, an attempt to create a combined similarity measure could have been undertaken (e.g., following the discussion found in [92]). However, this is outside the scope of this contribution.…”
Section: Extracting Common Entities From Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many other approaches to combining metadata and network characteristics were tested, e.g., using the percent difference with the score or the sum with the degree of centrality, etc. (we note that there are almost infinitely many ways to calculate a similarity between two characteristics (see, for instance, [98])). Moreover, multiple popular graph metrics from the previous study [71] were also attempted, i.e., pagerank [99], voterank, closeness centrality [100], betweenness centrality [101], current flow closeness centrality [102], current flow betweenness centrality [102,103].…”
Section: Recallmentioning
confidence: 99%