2003
DOI: 10.1177/0894318402239058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensions of Scholarship and the Advancement of Nursing Science: Articulating a Vision

Abstract: Nursing science, if defined as only the works emanating from the totality and simultaneity paradigms, cannot be said to have had a transformed nursing practice. Indeed, general acceptance of nursing theory as that which guides inquiry, education, and practice in nursing has not been achieved. In this column, the author calls for a more inclusive conceptualization of nursing science, beyond the acknowledged intradisciplinary paradigms. Nursing is posited as a human science with multiple paradigms, and two new p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In sum, what is the recipe for a feasible approach to effectively integrating the individual, group, team and organizational innovation processes? As suggested by Woodman et al (1993) , this will be an interactive process. Hiring the best people with relevant job skills, reasonable social skills, and some evidence of capacity for creative thinking would of course be a first step.…”
Section: Pulling It All Together: Individuals Groups/teams and Orgamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sum, what is the recipe for a feasible approach to effectively integrating the individual, group, team and organizational innovation processes? As suggested by Woodman et al (1993) , this will be an interactive process. Hiring the best people with relevant job skills, reasonable social skills, and some evidence of capacity for creative thinking would of course be a first step.…”
Section: Pulling It All Together: Individuals Groups/teams and Orgamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If you were viewing from a purist nursing science view, then the phenomenon would not be considered to build nursing science and the discipline because it does not utilize a pure nursing theory as the underlying framework to guide conceptualization and testing (Barrett, 2002;Rawnsley, 2003). If looking at it from a more liberal framework then the phenomenon would contribute to nursing science as the model, although not conceptualized from a nursing theory, is concerned with the impact of information systems on nursing practice, and as such, the phenomenon of interest builds both nursing science and the discipline (Barrett, 2002;Rawnsley, 2003). Furthermore, the model includes and addresses the four metatparadigm concepts of nursing: Person, environment, health, and nursing.…”
Section: Credibility Of the Model For Nursing Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also numerous methods of classifying the paradigms utilized in nursing science. The examples cited in the nursing literature include Rawnsley's (2003) terms human science 1 and human science 2, which correspond respectively to Fawcett and Garity's (2009) description of the naturalistic and postpositivist paradigms. However, Fawcett and Garity added a third paradigm called the critical emancipatory paradigm.…”
Section: Paradigms and Parental Hopementioning
confidence: 99%