1938
DOI: 10.1007/bf02996604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digestion and absorption in a man with three feet of small intestine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1950
1950
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Flint [17] resected more than 70% of the intestine of dogs and found a duplication of the size of the cilium, which he interpreted as a quadruple increase of the area of absorptive surface. In 1939, West [18] demonstrated a hypertrophy in the residual intestine of a patient, who 2 years previously, had undergone a massive resection. Similar clinical findings were found by Althausen [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Flint [17] resected more than 70% of the intestine of dogs and found a duplication of the size of the cilium, which he interpreted as a quadruple increase of the area of absorptive surface. In 1939, West [18] demonstrated a hypertrophy in the residual intestine of a patient, who 2 years previously, had undergone a massive resection. Similar clinical findings were found by Althausen [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The data taken as a whole suggest that it is easier to meet the needs for energy and nitrogen by increasing oral intake than the needs for electrolytes and divalent ions. A review of the literature prior to the availability of parenteral nutrition shows that resections of up to 33% result in no malnutrition and those of up to 50% could be tolerated without special aids, but those in excess of 75% require nutritional support to avoid severe malnutrition [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Absorption Of Nutrientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removal of large lengths of intestine is not lightly undertaken but cannot be avoided when the surgeon is faced with extensive gangrene. These resections, however extensive, are always worth while since there are many who not only survive but return to a tolerable life following resection of 80% to 90% of their small bowel (West et al, 1938;Todd et al, 1940;Holman, 1944;Meyer, 1946;Cogswell, 1948;Althausen et al, 1949;McClenahan and Fisher, 1950;Wilkie, 1950;Jackson and Linder, 1951;Berman et al, 1953;Martin et al, 1953;Bothe et al, 1954;Trafford, 1956;Pilling and Cresson, 1957). At the same time not all have fared so well.…”
Section: Reasons For Massive Resectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then many reports show that life is possible with as little as 18 in. of small bowel, though Haymond's conclusions still provide a good working rule (West et al, 1938;Meyer, 1946;Cogswell, 1948;Althausen et al, 1949;Berman et al, 1950;Christensen et al, 1950;Berman et al, 1953;Pearce et al, 1953;Bothe et al, 1954;Eckstam and Barry, 1954;Jackson and Linder, 1955;Montgomery and Pincus, 1955;Schwartz et al, 1955;Trafford, 1956;Pilling and Cresson, 1957).…”
Section: Amount Of Small Bowel Remainingmentioning
confidence: 99%