1986
DOI: 10.1016/0301-6226(86)90054-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digestibility and absorption of nutrients as affected by fibre content in the diet of the pig. Quantitative aspects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
28
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained for the C diet are in agreement with previous studies which showed that the BW of growing animals has no effect on the energy digestibility coefficient for highly digestible diets [9,21]. However, these studies also demonstrated that increased BW of pigs enhanced the energy digestibility coefficient of fibre-rich diets or fibrous ingredients in relation to greater digestibility of the DF fraction in heavier pigs.…”
Section: Influence Of Body Weight Of Pigs On Digestive Utilisation Ofsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results obtained for the C diet are in agreement with previous studies which showed that the BW of growing animals has no effect on the energy digestibility coefficient for highly digestible diets [9,21]. However, these studies also demonstrated that increased BW of pigs enhanced the energy digestibility coefficient of fibre-rich diets or fibrous ingredients in relation to greater digestibility of the DF fraction in heavier pigs.…”
Section: Influence Of Body Weight Of Pigs On Digestive Utilisation Ofsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Indeed, pelleting can improve the digestive utilisation of the diet but at variable extents according to the age of the animal [10]. Other processing techniques (grinding) have been shown to be more beneficial to small pigs than to heavier pigs [9]. Accordingly, it can be hypothesised that pelleting improved the digestibility of the diets in growing pigs more than in finishing pigs with a subsequent lower difference in digestibility coefficients between both stages in the present study.…”
Section: Influence Of Body Weight Of Pigs On Digestive Utilisation Ofmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In the present study, 4% CM or RSM fed in diet to pigs had no negative effects on ADG, ADFI, and G:F, suggesting that inclusion of 4% RSM or CM was not sufficient to impair growth performance of finishing pigs. It is well known that RSM or CM has high fibre content that affects nutrient digestibility (Fernández and Jørgensen 1986;Landero et al 2011). Many researchers have attempted to enhance the nutrient digestibility of RSM through decreasing fibre content and anti-nutritional factors such as glucosinolates by improving processing methods and supplementation of enzymes including carbohydrase (Liu et al 2014;Sanjayan et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, it is accepted that increasing dietary NSP levels can have negative effects on the digestibility and rate of absorption of nutrients such as starch, protein and fat. In pigs, it was estimated that with each percentage increase of NDF (neutral detergent fiber), energy digestibility could be reduced by 0.4 to 1.8% for fiber from leguminous feeds and 0.9 to 1.0% for fiber from cereals (Fernandez and Jorgensen, 1986). Murray et al (1977) observed that the addition of gelforming (soluble) polysaccharides (methyl cellulose and pectin) to a diet (6% as replacement of starch) caused a decrease in the apparent digestibility of nitrogen at the terminal ileum.…”
Section: The Anti-nutritive Effect Of Nspmentioning
confidence: 99%