1998
DOI: 10.1021/la9801559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusional Deposition of Charged Latex Particles on Water−Solid Interfaces at Low Ionic Strength

Abstract: The deposition of positively charged latex particles with radii between 20 and 100 nm on a negatively charged mica surface is investigated with atomic force microscopy at low ionic strengths. The polystyrene latex spheres with amidine headgroups are characterized as to their size distribution, electrophoretic mobility, and aggregation behavior. Surface coverage measurements take into account the polydispersity of the particles on the surface. Deposition kinetics from a quiescent solution are, for low coverage,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
186
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
10
186
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional deposition of the larger particles is inertia impaction (Cohen et al 1990). Electrostatic forces may have an effect on the enhanced deposition of smaller particles (Elimelech and O'Meliat 1990;Semmler et al 1998). In the present experimental calibration, the impact of the particle charge should be minor because the PSL particles used for calibration were electrically neutral particles and electrostatic forces might not be important since the plates making up the DS were metal.…”
Section: Sampling Techniquementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Additional deposition of the larger particles is inertia impaction (Cohen et al 1990). Electrostatic forces may have an effect on the enhanced deposition of smaller particles (Elimelech and O'Meliat 1990;Semmler et al 1998). In the present experimental calibration, the impact of the particle charge should be minor because the PSL particles used for calibration were electrically neutral particles and electrostatic forces might not be important since the plates making up the DS were metal.…”
Section: Sampling Techniquementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Several theoretical approaches have been proposed to assess the influence of electrostatic repulsion on the extent of surface coverage (37)(38)(39)(40). Here, we attempt to relate the observed experimental behavior with two of these approaches.…”
Section: Maximum Fractional Surface Coveragementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Antelmi & Spalla 1999) with sapphire substrates and by Semmler et.al. with mica substrates (Semmler, Mann et al 1998). At the point of zero surface charge density (PZC) no particle adsorption was observed.…”
Section: Self Assembly Of Particle Monolayers On Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capillary forces (Fig.1a) act on particles as a result of the surface tension between the solvent and the particle material (Denkov, Velev et al 1992;Kralchevsky & Denkov 2001). After application of a droplet of a particle suspension onto a substrate (Denkov, Velev et al 1992;Burmeister, Schäfle et al 1997;Burmeister, Badowsky et al 1999), during the controlled withdrawal of a sample from a particle suspension (Choi, Jang et al 2004;Prevo & Velev 2004), during spin coating (Denis, Hanarp et al 2002;Choi, Jang et al 2004;Jiang & McFarland 2004) or after adsorption of particles to a substrate in a particle suspension (Semmler, Mann et al 1998;Serizawa, Takeshita et al 1998;Antelmi & Spalla 1999;Serizawa, Kamimura et al 2000;Hanarp, Sutherland et al 2003) the evaporation of the solvent plays a critical role with respect to the structure of the particle layer. As the thickness of the solvent layer becomes comparable to the particle diameter, attractive forces arise pulling particles together to form 2D crystals.…”
Section: Self Assembly Of Particle Monolayers On Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation