The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2008
DOI: 10.1143/jjap.47.8696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion of Boron near Projected Ranges of B and BF2 Ions Implanted in Silicon

Abstract: Site-controlled InAs quantum wires were fabricated on cleaved edges of AlGaAs/GaAs superlattices (SLs) by solid source molecular beam epitaxy. The cleaved edge of AlGaAs/GaAs SLs acted as a nanopattern for selective overgrowth after selective etching. By just growing 2.0 ML InAs without high temperature degassing, site-controlled InAs quantum wires were fabricated on the cleaved edge. Furthermore, atomic force microscopy demonstrates the diffusion of In atoms is strong toward the [001] direction on the (110) s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[4] Recently an interdigitated back contact cell was introduced using c-Si/SiO 2 /poly-Si passivated contacts formed by ion implantation [5][6][7][8][9] with a record 23.9% efficiency achieved by Rienäcker et al [10] In this cell configuration, the ions are implanted into a-Si or polycrystalline-Si (pc-Si) layers separated from the c-Si wafer by a thin oxide layer, instead of directly into the c-Si wafer. This eliminates the end-of-range damage such as dislocation loops [11] to the wafer, which in turn, lowers the post implantation thermal budget needed to activate and diffuse dopants in the pc-Si layer, rather than anneal out induced defects in the c-Si. These contacts have excellent passivation, J o < 10 fA/cm 2 , in both the p-type emitter and the n-type contact regions, and low enough specific contact resistivities to not limit the device.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4] Recently an interdigitated back contact cell was introduced using c-Si/SiO 2 /poly-Si passivated contacts formed by ion implantation [5][6][7][8][9] with a record 23.9% efficiency achieved by Rienäcker et al [10] In this cell configuration, the ions are implanted into a-Si or polycrystalline-Si (pc-Si) layers separated from the c-Si wafer by a thin oxide layer, instead of directly into the c-Si wafer. This eliminates the end-of-range damage such as dislocation loops [11] to the wafer, which in turn, lowers the post implantation thermal budget needed to activate and diffuse dopants in the pc-Si layer, rather than anneal out induced defects in the c-Si. These contacts have excellent passivation, J o < 10 fA/cm 2 , in both the p-type emitter and the n-type contact regions, and low enough specific contact resistivities to not limit the device.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, it is known that BF 2 + constitutes the majority of implanted specie through the PIII technique . Such ions amorphize the silicon surface and may induce end‐of‐range (EOR) damage such as dislocation loops (DLs) at the initial amorphous/crystalline interface after thermal annealing . Fluorine bubbles may also be trapped in some cases .…”
Section: Introduction: Boron Doping By Blii and Piiimentioning
confidence: 99%