Differenzialdiagnose von Befunden an der Gallenblase

Kopf, H; Schima, Wolfgang; Meng, Stefan

doi:10.1007/s00117-019-0504-y

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…1,2 A notable progression in this domain has been made with incorporation of sophisticated imaging methodologies such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST). 3,4 Orthopaedic trauma, which frequently arises from sports-related incidents or high-impact collisions, presents the substantial obstacle for healthcare practitioners. For effective treatment planning, precise evaluation of lesion depth and extent of musculoskeletal injuries is vital.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Bioanalytical assessment is of utmost importance in management of orthopaedic trauma, specifically in the evaluation of musculoskeletal injuries and laceration depth 1,2 . A notable progression in this domain has been made with incorporation of sophisticated imaging methodologies such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) 3,4 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Bioanalytical evaluation of wound depth and musculoskeletal injuries: Synergizing focused assessment with sonography for trauma with computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in orthopaedic trauma care

Xue,

Wen

2024

International Wound Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Orthopaedic trauma care frequently necessitates prompt and precise assessment of musculoskeletal injuries and wound depth. The potential for improved diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes exists with the integration of sophisticated imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST). The purpose of this research was to examine the benefits and drawbacks of this integrative method in the clinical environment. From June 2022 to September 2023, 250 patients who were admitted to Ningbo University Affiliated People's Hospital, participated in this cross‐sectional observational study. Following the administration of FAST, CT and MRI were utilized to evaluate orthopaedic injuries and skin wounds in patients. Analyses of data centred on the precision of diagnoses, the influence of treatment decisions and patient outcomes. Aged and gendered differently, the study participants sustained the variety of injuries and superficial wounds that were predominantly the result of traffic accidents. The FAST assay exhibited sensitivity of 65%, specificity of 80% and 72% overall accuracy. MRI demonstrated the finest diagnostic performance (85% sensitivity, 95% specificity and 89% accuracy), whereas CT scans offered improved diagnostic efficacy (80% sensitivity, 90% specificity and 84% accuracy). Treatment decisions were substantially impacted by integration of these imaging modalities, resulting in modifications in 20%–35% of cases, depending on the specific modality employed. Specifically, MRI played a pivotal role in informing treatment approaches, influencing non‐surgical as well as surgical procedures. This study substantiates the significant advantages of integrating FAST with CT and MRI in orthopaedic trauma care, particularly in the accurate assessment of wound depth. The synergistic use of these imaging techniques not only enhances diagnostic precision but also positively impacts treatment strategies and patient outcomes, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive diagnostic approach in trauma care settings.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%