2004
DOI: 10.1086/379939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiated Products Demand Systems from a Combination of Micro and Macro Data: The New Car Market

Abstract: In this paper, we consider how rich sources of information on consumer choice can help to identify demand parameters in a widely used class of differentiated products demand models. Most important, we show how to use "second-choice" data on automotive purchases to obtain good estimates of substitution patterns in the automobile industry. We use our estimates to make out-of-sample predictions about important recent changes in industry structure.We thank numerous seminar participants, two referees, and the edito… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
437
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 545 publications
(451 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(19 reference statements)
10
437
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…To exploit the richness of rank-ordered data, we do not restrict the correlation across the dimensions of γ i . Berry, Levinsohn, and Pakes (2004) show that data on top and second choices improves on estimates that only use first choice by revealing common characteristics between subsequent rankings for a given student. Rank-ordered data also allow us to relax the common assumption that random coefficients on choice characteristics are independently distributed.…”
Section: B Model and Estimationmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To exploit the richness of rank-ordered data, we do not restrict the correlation across the dimensions of γ i . Berry, Levinsohn, and Pakes (2004) show that data on top and second choices improves on estimates that only use first choice by revealing common characteristics between subsequent rankings for a given student. Rank-ordered data also allow us to relax the common assumption that random coefficients on choice characteristics are independently distributed.…”
Section: B Model and Estimationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…It is worth noting that the difference in levels between our model and the data is small compared to the difference between the average distance to a high school in New York (12.7 miles from home) and the closest school (less than a mile from home). Berry, Levinsohn, and Pakes (2004) emphasize the importance of random coefficients models in the context of rank data for automobiles. In particular, they emphasize that when examining the within-consumer relationship between the attributes of alternatives ranked first and second, models without random coefficients do a poor job.…”
Section: A Model Fitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The econometric procedure also corrects for the remaining within-panel unobserved serial dependence. The point- 4 In Dubé (2000), I present comparable evidence for other di¤erentiated products industries such as ready-to-eat cereals, canned soups and cookies. 5 One needs to estimate at least as many parameters as the square of the number of merged products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…For instance, a typical household shopping trip for CSDs may involve the purchase multiple units of an assortment of brands from a broad set of more than 1000 SKUs. 4 The traditional residual demand approach reduces analysis to the merged …rms' products without assuming speci…c consumer behavior (Baker and Bresnahan 1985), but its feasibility diminishes for mergers between …rms with extensive product lines 5 . The multi-level demand approach reduces the number of estimated parameters by grouping products a priori into segments and assuming consumers make sequential budgetting decisions (Hausman, Leonard and Zona 1994and Hausman 1996, Cotterill, Franklin and Ma 1996.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, their specification does not allow decision makers to plan future promotions or derive insights about how characteristics of each promotion program have driven the results or what the effects of competition might be. More recently, Berry et al (1995Berry et al ( , 2004, Sudhir (2001), Train and Winston (2007), quantify consumer response to price in the automobile market, but their price analyses are limited to MSRP and do not address the multiple instruments that are used for price customization. Bruce et al (2006) examine the logic of offering consumer rebates by automakers in a context in which consumers face a constraint in their "ability-to-pay" for a durable product (automobiles) with an alternative second-hand market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%