2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-7005-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential impact of Limnoperna fortunei-herbicide interaction between Roundup Max® and glyphosate on freshwater microscopic communities

Abstract: Multiple anthropogenic stressors act simultaneously on the environment, with consequences different from those caused by single-stressor exposure. We investigated how the combination of the invasive mussel Limnoperna fortunei and a widely applied herbicide, Roundup Max®, affected freshwater microscopic communities and water quality. Further, we compared these results with those induced by the combination of the mussel and technical-grade glyphosate. We carried out a 34-day experiment in outdoor mesocosms, appl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of initial glyphosate concentrations in the culture medium was carried out by HPLC-UV chromatography after a derivatization step with FMOC-Cl, as described in Gattás et al (2016). The limit of detection and quantification of the resulting procedure were 0.2 and 0.7 mg L −1 , respectively, and the percent variation coefficient was of 4.3%.…”
Section: Chemicalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of initial glyphosate concentrations in the culture medium was carried out by HPLC-UV chromatography after a derivatization step with FMOC-Cl, as described in Gattás et al (2016). The limit of detection and quantification of the resulting procedure were 0.2 and 0.7 mg L −1 , respectively, and the percent variation coefficient was of 4.3%.…”
Section: Chemicalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been demonstrated that the joint effect of Limnoperna fortunei and glyphosate on the structure of freshwater microbial communities and water quality is different from the effect of each factor considered separately (Pizarro et al, 2015a). Gattás et al (2016) reported that L. fortunei seemed to be the most powerful driver of the interaction, which elicited different responses depending on whether it involved glyphosate or a commercial formulation (Roundup Max ® ). In this study another widely used glyphosate-based formulation, Glifosato Atanor ® , was included in the analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, the addition of Roundup Max ® and Glifosato Atanor ® caused rapid changes in water chemistry as indicated by the significant increase in ammonium concentration at Ti. In the case of Roundup Max ® , this may have been due to its active ingredient, which is a monoammonium salt of N-phosphonomethylglycine that dissociates in aqueous solution releasing ammonium (Gattás et al, 2016). The ammonium increase resulting from the addition of Glifosato Atanor ® would be explained by the formulation adjuvants of unknown specific composition because its active ingredient is a monopotassium salt of glyphosate (Giesy et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ecología Austral 29:020-027 grade glyphosate (Vera et al 2014). On the other hand, Gattás et al (2016) reported that Chlorophyceae and Desmidiaceae were favored by both Roundup Max ® and the active ingredient. In our study, both glyphosate-based formulations showed higher toxicity than the technical-grade glyphosate for Chlorophyta and Bacillariophyta.…”
Section: Gonzalez Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%