2014
DOI: 10.1590/bjb.2014.0090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential habitat use by demographic groups of the redfinger rubble crab Eriphia gonagra (Fabricius, 1781)

Abstract: The structurally diverse rocky shores along the northern coast of the state of São Paulo, Brazil, support a varied fauna and provide refuges for many organisms. Some of these environments allow for extensive microhabitats, among them the sand reefs formed by the polychaete Phragmatopoma lapidosa, which occupy much of this area. The beauty of the landscape attracts large numbers of tourists, who contribute to the damage to the sand reef colonies, causing an imbalance in the patterns of population distribution a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Andrade et al (2014a) extrapolated this statement in determining the differential distribution of Callinectes ornatus Ordway, 1863 in different states of reproductive potential. Based on the same principles, Andrade et al (2014b) found differential occupation of the habitat by different demographic groups of Eriphia gonagra (Fabricius, 1781). The results of the present study revealed that areas farther the coast were not densely occupied by males and females with rudimentary or developing gonads, which were found in fewer numbers; however, reproductive females were found at depths up to 15 m (see Table 1 and Figure 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Andrade et al (2014a) extrapolated this statement in determining the differential distribution of Callinectes ornatus Ordway, 1863 in different states of reproductive potential. Based on the same principles, Andrade et al (2014b) found differential occupation of the habitat by different demographic groups of Eriphia gonagra (Fabricius, 1781). The results of the present study revealed that areas farther the coast were not densely occupied by males and females with rudimentary or developing gonads, which were found in fewer numbers; however, reproductive females were found at depths up to 15 m (see Table 1 and Figure 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The available knowledge on this species is related to larval and juvenile development (Fransozo, 1986;Fransozo and Negreiros-Fransozo, 1986;1987;; heterochely, sex ratio, relative growth (Góes and Fransozo, 1997;2000, respectively), fecundity (Góes et al, 2005) and differential habitat use by demographic groups (Andrade et al, 2014). The multiple spawning was suggested to occur in this species (Góes et al, 2005), but no conclusive evidence was provided by authors.…”
Section: Reproductive Investment In Eriphia Gonagramentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Eriphia gonagra (Fabricius, 1781) is a common crab in the intertidal zone on the northern coast of São Paulo State, Brazil and it can be find in rocky shores or living associated with colonies of Phragmatopoma (Polychaeta, Sabellariidae) (Andrade et al, 2014). The available knowledge on this species is related to larval and juvenile development (Fransozo, 1986;Fransozo and Negreiros-Fransozo, 1986;1987;; heterochely, sex ratio, relative growth (Góes and Fransozo, 1997;2000, respectively), fecundity (Góes et al, 2005) and differential habitat use by demographic groups (Andrade et al, 2014).…”
Section: Reproductive Investment In Eriphia Gonagramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Habitat partitioning by different life stages and/or phenotypes within a species in a heterogeneous environment could confer fitness advantages. For example, habitat partitioning occurs across taxa for reproduction (Campbell, 1986;Hooper, 1986;Bowyer et al, 2002), molting (Hines et al, 1987), life history stages (Kanciruk and Herrnkind, 1978;Hatase et al, 2002;Andrade et al, 2014), and phenotypic variants (Shine et al, 2012). Individuals of varying color patterns could select different habitat types for camouflage (Endler, 1984;King, 1993;Guinot and Wicksten, 2015), to facilitate antipredator behaviors (Brodie, 1989), or for optimal thermal strategies (Wilkens and Fingerman, 1965).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%