In the Laurentian Great Lakes, the invasive form of Phragmites australis (common reed) poses a threat to highly productive coastal wetlands and shorelines by forming impenetrable stands that outcompete native plants. Large, dominant stands can derail efforts to restore wetland ecosystems degraded by other stressors. To be proactive, landscape-level management of Phragmites requires information on the current spatial distribution of the species and a characterization of areas suitable for future colonization. Using a recent basin-scale map of this invasive plant's distribution in the U.S. coastal zone of the Great Lakes, environmental data (e.g., soils, nutrients, disturbance, climate, topography), and climate predictions, we performed analyses of current and predicted suitable coastal habitat using boosted regression trees, a type of species distribution modeling. We also investigated differential influences of environmental variables in the upper lakes (Lakes Superior, Michigan, and Huron) and lower lakes (Lakes St. Clair, Erie, and Ontario). Basin-wide results showed that the coastal areas most vulnerable to Phragmites expansion were in close proximity to developed lands and had minimal topographic relief, poorly drained soils, and dense road networks. Elevated nutrients and proximity to agriculture also influenced the distribution of Phragmites. Climate predictions indicated an increase in suitable habitat in coastal Lakes Huron and Michigan in particular. The results of this study, combined with a publicly available online decision support tool, will enable resource managers and restoration practitioners to target and prioritize Phragmites control efforts in the Great Lakes coastal zone.
The practice of claw removal in the fishery for stone crab Menippe spp. can affect fished populations in an atypical way because harvested individuals are not necessarily killed. In all stone crab fisheries, crabs are returned to the water after their claws are harvested with the expectation that claws may be regenerated, thus “renewing” the fishery. The number of legal‐sized claws that can be removed from an individual differs (with local regulations) throughout the stone crabs' range. We examined the direct and indirect consequences of removing one and two claws by monitoring mortality and prey consumption in the short term (14 d) and mortality and growth over the long term (11 months). Claw removal induced mortality within days when wound widths were greater than 7 mm, regardless of the number of claws removed. Wound widths created by autotomy were similar to those created by a clean, forced break along the natural fracture plane. These results suggest that direct mortality following claw removal may be low in a two‐claw fishery for stone crabs that do not incur large wounds; however, indirect effects that result from altered feeding abilities may be substantial. Stone crabs with one claw removed (the crusher) consumed fewer bivalves than control (intact) crabs, whereas stone crabs with two claws removed did not consume any bivalves but ate fish flesh. Consequently, bivalves, an important prey resource throughout the stone crabs' geographical range, are eliminated from a clawless crab's diet until its claws are regenerated. No stone crabs regenerated a legal‐sized claw on the first molt after claw removal, and no stone crabs larger than 104 mm carapace width molted within 11 months. Thus, the long intermolt duration of legal‐sized stone crabs and the reduced prey consumption for stone crabs that lost claws indicate that the return to the fishery of previously harvested stone crabs is probably an uncommon occurrence.
Received December 17, 2014; accepted June 15, 2015
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.