“…Due to their low dispersal abilities (Bowne & Bowers, ; Graeter, Rothermel, & Gibbons, ), small effective population sizes (Funk, Tallmon, & Allendorf, ) and the discontinuous distribution of their preferred breeding habitats (Jehle, Burke, & Arntzen, ), they tend to form “patchy” breeding assemblages. Dispersal and the maintenance of gene flow between breeding ponds depends on the composition and configuration of the landscape (Coster et al., ), and studies focusing on functional connectivity have described different species responses to landscape features such as differences in soil moisture, clear‐cut habitats, agriculture lands, riparian network, as well as differences in metamorphosis, philopatry, dispersal, selection of breeding sites and post‐breeding behaviour (Coster et al., ; Goldberg & Waits, ; Peterman et al., ; Richardson, ; Steele et al., ). Identification of the factors promoting or reducing gene flow is key to prevent local and regional extinctions in the long‐term and to inform conservation management.…”