2017
DOI: 10.1111/mec.14272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative landscape genetics of pond‐breeding amphibians in Mediterranean temporal wetlands: The positive role of structural heterogeneity in promoting gene flow

Abstract: Comparative landscape genetics studies can provide key information to implement cost-effective conservation measures favouring a broad set of taxa. These studies are scarce, particularly in Mediterranean areas, which include diverse but threatened biological communities. Here, we focus on Mediterranean wetlands in central Iberia and perform a multi-level, comparative study of two endemic pond-breeding amphibians, a salamander (Pleurodeles waltl) and a toad (Pelobates cultripes). We genotyped 411 salamanders fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative explanation is that dispersal is instead shaped by topography, with animals moving preferentially downslope from Laguna to Gravera. This is consistent with landscape genetics studies showing a significant effect of slope on resistance to gene flow (Gutiérrez-Rodríguez et al 2017a).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An alternative explanation is that dispersal is instead shaped by topography, with animals moving preferentially downslope from Laguna to Gravera. This is consistent with landscape genetics studies showing a significant effect of slope on resistance to gene flow (Gutiérrez-Rodríguez et al 2017a).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Understanding functional connectivity among demes in population networks is thus paramount to prevent and reverse negative population trends (Petranka et al 2004;Leung et al 2017). Attempts to characterize patterns of connectivity among amphibian populations at the landscape scale have largely relied on molecular markers to identify factors that promote or restrict gene flow (Newman and Squire 2001;Wang 2009a;Gutiérrez-Rodríguez et al 2017a). However, in the absence of information on the frequencies and distances of individual displacement events, it is difficult to relate gene flow estimates with the actual dispersal capacity of individuals, which is a critical parameter to design and implement conservation actions (Sinsch et al 2012;Sinsch 2014;Trochet et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several factors may be driving this pattern, including past episodes of forest contraction and expansion and biogeographic barriers (i.e., rivers or valleys). These landscape features are thought to operate on much deeper time scales than anthropogenic change in terms of their influence on an organism’s dispersal abilities, population connectivity, and genetic structure 89 . In an earlier study, we identified genetic clustering on either side of the Mangoro—the largest river in eastern Madagascar—lending support to these findings, and leading us to hypothesize that Madagascar’s rivers structure V .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, comparative studies can provide insights into whether relationships between landscape features and genetic distance differ among taxa, habitat types, and geographic areas. Comparative studies examining either ecologically similar or distinct species in the same landscape have become more common in recent years, providing novel perspectives on different species' relationships with the landscape (Engler et al 2014;Whiteley et al 2014;Mims et al 2015;Kierepka et al 2016;Burkhart et al 2017;Gutiérrez-Rodríguez et al 2017). In one such study, Engler et al (2014) determined that among three Hesperid butterfly species in the genus Thymelicus, recent human land conversion restricted gene flow in a poorly dispersing habitat specialist, while a generalist with moderate dispersal abilities was restricted by climate, and another generalist that was the strongest disperser exhibited IBD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%