2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2017.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential associations of lower cardiac vagal tone with insulin resistance and insulin secretion in recently diagnosed type 1 and type 2 diabetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, Razainskaite-Virbichiene et al (36) demonstrated that in patients with T1DM, the parameters of time domain in supine position have a coefficient of variation <1.65, reflecting a sensitivity of 94.3% and specificity of 91.5% for the diagnosis of CAN. Additionally HRV variables were independent predictors for developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with T2DM (28,30,34,36). These findings are in agreement with our results that showed improvement in rest HRV parameters in response to short interventional treatment, as opposed to dynamic tests that remained unchanged.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Likewise, Razainskaite-Virbichiene et al (36) demonstrated that in patients with T1DM, the parameters of time domain in supine position have a coefficient of variation <1.65, reflecting a sensitivity of 94.3% and specificity of 91.5% for the diagnosis of CAN. Additionally HRV variables were independent predictors for developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with T2DM (28,30,34,36). These findings are in agreement with our results that showed improvement in rest HRV parameters in response to short interventional treatment, as opposed to dynamic tests that remained unchanged.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Besides that, it is easier to be performed than dynamic tests and does not need patient collaboration (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35). Takase et al (28) found that a cut-off point <30ms in SDNN parameter has a sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 92% for CAN diagnosis in patients with type 2 diabetes, while Ziegler et al (30) showed that HF index was more sensitive than functional tests to detect precocious autonomic disorder in patients with diabetes, using 0,892 as a cut-off. Likewise, Razainskaite-Virbichiene et al (36) demonstrated that in patients with T1DM, the parameters of time domain in supine position have a coefficient of variation <1.65, reflecting a sensitivity of 94.3% and specificity of 91.5% for the diagnosis of CAN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to established cardiometabolic risk factors, CAN is an independent determinant of cardiovascular morbidity, progression of diabetic nephropathy and overall mortality (4)(5)(6). Autonomic imbalance has been associated with reduced insulin sensitivity and β-cell function in individuals with recent onset of type 1 and type 2 diabetes and have been suggested to be mediated by changes in the innervation of the endocrine pancreas (7) where pancreatic islets are innervated by both parasympathetic and sympathetic nerves and are involved in pancreatic hormone secretion (8). In addition, peripheral insulin sensitivity may be associated with autonomic function as hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp studies have demonstrated that insulin sensitivity can be affected by autonomic blockade in obese insulin-resistant individuals (9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HRV R-R intervals were measured in the supine position during a hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp over 3 h using a digital Spider View Holter recorder with seven electrodes to record three-channel ECGs (Sorin Group, Munich, Germany) as previously described [16]. Time-domain HRV measures included the SD of differences between adjacent normal-to-normal (NN) intervals, SD of all NN intervals (SDNN), the number of pairs of adjacent NN intervals differing by >50 ms in the entire recording divided by the total number of NN intervals (pNN50), and the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%