2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different regrouping schedules in semi group-housed rabbit does: Effects on agonistic behaviour, stress and lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
12
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Progesterone concentrations higher than 2 mg/mL were proven to negatively affect the kindling rate in these does. However, no stress response in rabbit does during regrouping, as estimated by body temperature measurements, was detected during this study (Braconnier et al, 2020). Others reported similar results in the past (Andrist et al, 2012;Buijs and Maertens, 2015).…”
Section: Doessupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Progesterone concentrations higher than 2 mg/mL were proven to negatively affect the kindling rate in these does. However, no stress response in rabbit does during regrouping, as estimated by body temperature measurements, was detected during this study (Braconnier et al, 2020). Others reported similar results in the past (Andrist et al, 2012;Buijs and Maertens, 2015).…”
Section: Doessupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Furthermore, it has been hypothesised that kits in TG12 may face higher mortality, as their mothers are in a possibly stressful situation during regrouping, while the kits are still depending on their care. However, no stress response was detected (Braconnier et al, 2020), maternal failure (causing starvation of kits) did not occur and kit survival was not influenced by the time point of grouping. Kits in TG12 may not have been physically able to leave their cage at regrouping (12 dpp), and therefore could not have become malnourished and/or hypothermic.…”
Section: Kitsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Little is known about how steroid hormones could influence agonistic behaviour in female does: two studies found an increased aggressive response in ovariectomised, oestradiol-treated does given P4 peripherally (Hoffman et al, 2009) or into the hypothalamus (Palka and Sawyer, 1966). Therefore, the main aim of this study was to determine the concentrations of testosterone, progesterone and oestradiol during the pregnant-lactating phase of does and analyse their relation with the agonistic behaviour shown at grouping which was reported previously (Braconnier et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A better understanding of the temporal variation in hormonal secretion during lactation and simultaneous gestation might help us determine an optimal time point for grouping. In addition, we correlated the anogenital distance (AGD) measured at AI (Braconnier et al, 2020) with the hormonal values during pregnancy/lactation because: a) earlier studies suggested that AGD at birth could be useful in selecting less aggressive does for communal breeding (Buijs et al, 2016); b) there is a correlation between the AGD measured at birth and that observed in adult does (Bánszegi et al, 2009). If a correlation was found, AGD could serve as a prediction of the aggressive potential of individual does.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, space restrictions led to increased fighting, most likely due to special stress. Sufficient space to escape and adequate enrichment items to hide in or behind might therefore improve animals’ well-being and prevent injuries and intense fights, even after re-grouping [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%