1961
DOI: 10.1007/bf01451331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die Normalisierung komplexer R�ume

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1962
1962
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By the previous paragraph, the induced germ of an analytic function η : ( X , 0) → (X , 0) is finite and generically 1-1. On the other hand, it is known that X normal implies that ( X , 0) normal [15,Satz 4]. By the uniqueness of normalization we conclude that η : ( X , 0) → (X , 0) is the normalization of (X , 0).…”
Section: Lemma 22 With the Previous Notationmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By the previous paragraph, the induced germ of an analytic function η : ( X , 0) → (X , 0) is finite and generically 1-1. On the other hand, it is known that X normal implies that ( X , 0) normal [15,Satz 4]. By the uniqueness of normalization we conclude that η : ( X , 0) → (X , 0) is the normalization of (X , 0).…”
Section: Lemma 22 With the Previous Notationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In this setting the image of I ∆ by the morphism ψ * in C{t } is of the form: A similar analysis as in the previous case shows that A ∪ B is the minimal generating set of Γ s and has cardinality N + 1. From the previous corollary we have the semigroup Γ s associated to the Lipschitz saturation (X s , 0) with minimal generating set A s = {(1, 0), (3,5), (3,10), (3,12), (3,13), (3,14), (3,15), (3,17), (3,18), (3,19), (3,20), (0, 11)}, normalization map η : (C 2 , 0) −→ (X s , 0) ⊂ (C 12 , 0) (u, v) → u, u 3 v 5 , u 3 v 10 , u 3 v 12 , u 3 v 13 , u 3 v 14 , u 3 v 15 , u 3 v 17 , u 3 v 18 , u 3 v 19 , u 3 v 20 , v 11 , and embedding dimension 12.…”
Section: Proof (Of Theorem 32 )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let B$\widetilde{B}$ and D$\widetilde{D}$ denote the preimages of B$B$ and D$D$ in scriptZfalse(dfalse)${\mathcal {Z}}(d)$ and trueX(d)${\tilde{\mathcal {X}}}(d)$, respectively. By [23, Theorem 4], B$\widetilde{B}$ and D$\widetilde{D}$ are normal complex spaces. The preimage of the smooth locus of B$B$ and D$D$ in B$\widetilde{B}$ and D$\widetilde{D}$ are denoted by trueB$\widetilde{B}^{\circ }$ and trueD$\widetilde{D}^{\circ }$, respectively.…”
Section: Quiver Varieties and Slodowy Slicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Es 1/~gt sich folgendermagen vorgehen (Man vergleiche hierzu den Beweis yon [11], Satz 1): P ~ X sei normal. Da X dann in P irreduzibel ist, existiert eine Umgebung U 1 yon P, so dab U 1 irreduzibel (und insbesondere rein-dimensional) ist.…”
Section: E(u)/(g" E(u)unclassified