Abstract:The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted regular classes in spring 2020. Temporary school closures supposedly led to a considerable learning loss, particularly for low-achieving students. Schools in Baden-Württemberg, Germany, were closed for two months. Although distance learning was implemented, students spent less time learning. Additionally, teachers were faced with organizational and technological challenges of remote learning environments. The present study investigates the competencies of fifth… Show more
“…Gore et al (2021) found Year 3 students studying math in low ICSEA schools (Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage schools) to be two months behind the progress students made in 2019 in Australia. Lastly, Schult et al (2021) find learning losses of 0.07 SD in reading comprehension, 0.09 in operations, and 0.03 in numbers for Grade 5 students in Germany.…”
Section: Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 81%
“…Gore et al (2021) found the only losses to be amongst students from low ICSEA schools where the lower the ICSEA level the lower the educational advantage attending students have due to their parents' occupation and education, their geographical location, and the school's proportion of indigenous students (Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority, 2016). Schult et al (2021) found losses in math amongst grade 5 students to be more severe in low achieving students. In reading comprehension Schult et al (2021) found more severe losses amongst middle to high achieving students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Schult et al (2021) found losses in math amongst grade 5 students to be more severe in low achieving students. In reading comprehension Schult et al (2021) found more severe losses amongst middle to high achieving students.…”
With COVID-19 having caused significant disruption to the global education system, researchers are beginning to become concerned with the impact that this has had on student learning progress and, in particular, if learning loss has been experienced. To evaluate this, we conduct a thorough analysis of recorded learning loss evidence documented between March 2020 and March 2021. This systematic review aims to consolidate available data and document what has currently been reported in the literature. Given the novelty of the subject, eight studies were identified; seven of these found evidence of student learning loss amongst at least some of the participants, while one of the seven also found instances of learning gains in a particular subgroup. The remaining study found increased learning gains in their participants. Additionally, four of the studies observed increases in inequality where certain demographics of students experienced learning losses more significant than others. It is determined that further research is needed to increase the quantity of studies produced, their geographical focus, and the numbers of students they observe.
“…Gore et al (2021) found Year 3 students studying math in low ICSEA schools (Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage schools) to be two months behind the progress students made in 2019 in Australia. Lastly, Schult et al (2021) find learning losses of 0.07 SD in reading comprehension, 0.09 in operations, and 0.03 in numbers for Grade 5 students in Germany.…”
Section: Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 81%
“…Gore et al (2021) found the only losses to be amongst students from low ICSEA schools where the lower the ICSEA level the lower the educational advantage attending students have due to their parents' occupation and education, their geographical location, and the school's proportion of indigenous students (Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority, 2016). Schult et al (2021) found losses in math amongst grade 5 students to be more severe in low achieving students. In reading comprehension Schult et al (2021) found more severe losses amongst middle to high achieving students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Schult et al (2021) found losses in math amongst grade 5 students to be more severe in low achieving students. In reading comprehension Schult et al (2021) found more severe losses amongst middle to high achieving students.…”
With COVID-19 having caused significant disruption to the global education system, researchers are beginning to become concerned with the impact that this has had on student learning progress and, in particular, if learning loss has been experienced. To evaluate this, we conduct a thorough analysis of recorded learning loss evidence documented between March 2020 and March 2021. This systematic review aims to consolidate available data and document what has currently been reported in the literature. Given the novelty of the subject, eight studies were identified; seven of these found evidence of student learning loss amongst at least some of the participants, while one of the seven also found instances of learning gains in a particular subgroup. The remaining study found increased learning gains in their participants. Additionally, four of the studies observed increases in inequality where certain demographics of students experienced learning losses more significant than others. It is determined that further research is needed to increase the quantity of studies produced, their geographical focus, and the numbers of students they observe.
“…One study reported an interaction between grade and SES, that is, for younger children from schools with low school-level SES, learning losses of 0.16 SD were found, while younger children from schools with medium school-level SES experienced learning gains of 0.15 SD (Gore et al, 2021). Additionally, low-performing students were more affected by COVID-19-related school closures in mathematics, while highperforming students were more affected by COVID-19-related school closures in reading (Schult et al, 2021). Finally, low-performing students benefited more from systematic online learning methods (Clark et al, 2020;Spitzer & Musslick, 2021).…”
Section: Differential Effects On Groups Of Studentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For mathematics, effects varied between +0.20 SD and -0.19 SD (Mdn = -0.12 SD), with seven studies reporting a negative effect (Clark et al, 2020;Depping et al, 2021;Engzell et al, 2021;Maldonado & De Witte, 2020;Schult et al, 2021;Tomasik et al, 2020) and three studies reporting a positive effect (Gore et al, 2021;Meeter, 2021;Spitzer & Musslick, 2020) of COVID-19-related school closures on student achievement in mathematics. For reading, the effects found varied between -0.29 SD and +0.04 SD (Mdn = -0.14 SD), with six studies reporting a negative effect (Clark et al, 2020;Depping et al, 2021;Engzell et al, 2021;Maldonado & De Witte, 2020;Schult et al, 2021;Tomasik et al, 2020) and one study reporting a positive effect (Gore et al, 2021) of COVID-19-related school closures on student achievement in reading. For French as a foreign language, one study reported a large learning loss of 0.30 SD (Maldonado & De Witte, 2020), while another study reported an increase in correct solutions within a French learning program (van der Velde et al, 2021) during the COVID-19-related school closures.…”
Section: General Effects Of Covid-19-related School Closures On Student Achievementmentioning
The COVID-19 pandemic led to numerous governments deciding to close schools for several weeks in spring 2020. Empirical evidence on the impact of COVID-19-related school closures on academic achievement is only just emerging in the literature. The present work aimed to provide a first systematic overview of evidence-based studies on general and differential effects of COVID-19-related school closures in spring 2020 on student achievement in K–12. The findings indicate a considerably negative effect of school closures on student achievement specifically in younger students and students from families with low socioeconomic status. At the same time, certain measures can be identified that might mitigate these negative effects. The findings are discussed in the context of their possible consequences for future national educational policies when facing future school closures.
Education reform has emerged as the main policy priority during the global pandemic. Given the effect of education on individual well-being and macrolevel socioeconomic growth, countries have undertaken a variety of policy measures to offset the negative ramifications of the health outbreak on learning processes. This article examines policy conditions that shape disparities in education policy and learning outcomes across eurozone countries. It argues that sustaining robust education systems in the postpandemic era calls for policy initiatives that strengthen digital literacy and ensure equitable learning opportunities for all student demographics. Examining preexisting education policy and digital literacy, I argue that strengthening partnerships among education stakeholders and making efficient use of resources effectively sets eurozone countries on a path to education recovery. Policy measures that advance the digitalization of learning infrastructures have the capacity to increase human capital and narrow postpandemic socioeconomic disparities among eurozone countries.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.