1980
DOI: 10.2737/pnw-rp-275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diameter and height growth of suppressed grand fir saplings after overstory removal.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
4
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specific study objectives were: (1) to determine and compare rates of diameter and height growth before and after release for each species, (2) to determine how soon after release the increased growth response occurs, and (3) to screen specific variables to use in models for predicting diameter and height growth. This study expands on an earlier study that was limited to one species and a single stand (Seidel 1980b). …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specific study objectives were: (1) to determine and compare rates of diameter and height growth before and after release for each species, (2) to determine how soon after release the increased growth response occurs, and (3) to screen specific variables to use in models for predicting diameter and height growth. This study expands on an earlier study that was limited to one species and a single stand (Seidel 1980b). …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…It is also evident that the most vigorous trees grow the fastest and that the two individual tree variables most strongly correlated with tree vigor are live crown ratio and past 5-year height growth (Ferguson and Adams 1979, McCaughey and Schmidt 1982, Seidel 1980b. Thus, advance reproduction can easily be evaluated in the field to determiners management potential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pre-release height growth rate has been reported to be positively correlated with survival Ruel et al 1995) and post-release growth rates (Ferguson and Adarns 1980, Seidel 1980, Helms and Standiford 1985, Oliver 1985, Mceaughey and Ferguson 1988, Murphy et al 1999 for several conifer species. Because there is usually a direct link between stress and growth reduction, many authors are inclined to use growth rate as a measure of stress (Coley et al 1985).…”
Section: Height Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Live crown ratio, defined as the length of the live crown over total height, has often been identified as one of the best indicators of vigour for shade-tolerant conifers (Seidel 1980, Helms and Standiford 1985, Rue1 et al 1995. The amount of live crown retained in shaded conifer species probably varies between genera as reported by Takahashi (1 996) and Larivikre (1998) for fir and spruce.…”
Section: Live Crown Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation