2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.106183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dialogic communication on social media: How organizations use Twitter to build dialogic relationships with their publics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
89
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
7
89
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Dialogue is regarded as “negotiated exchange of ideas and opinions” [ 43 ]. The dialogue can be incorporated into daily public relations practices, which could lead to positive outcomes, such as trust, mutuality, and empathy [ 44 ]. According to the theory, dialogic loop is regarded as a key dialogic principle for a positive two-way dialogic relationship [ 43 ], which refers that the content released by organization could stimulate public dialogue, and the organization could raise questions to promote engagement, adding providing the dialogue channels and responding to public feedback timely [ 27 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dialogue is regarded as “negotiated exchange of ideas and opinions” [ 43 ]. The dialogue can be incorporated into daily public relations practices, which could lead to positive outcomes, such as trust, mutuality, and empathy [ 44 ]. According to the theory, dialogic loop is regarded as a key dialogic principle for a positive two-way dialogic relationship [ 43 ], which refers that the content released by organization could stimulate public dialogue, and the organization could raise questions to promote engagement, adding providing the dialogue channels and responding to public feedback timely [ 27 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognizing that social media provide a means of two-way interactions—which research suggests are crucial for effective communication [ 33 , 34 ]—individual scientists and NGOs are increasingly using social media platforms to communicate with their audiences and promote science literacy [ 46 , 47 , 68 , 75 , 106 ]. However, individual and NGO communicators have had difficulty fostering two-way exchanges with their audiences on social media [ 33 , 106 ]. With evidence that the way in which communicators use social media plays an important role in determining audience engagement [e.g., 31 ], this study investigated how individual and NGO communicators approach sharing scientific information on social media, and the strategies they apply to engage with their audiences (RQ1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is especially informative for understanding characteristics of science communication on social media, and could contribute to dialogic theory on science communication more broadly, as the results highlight factors that play an important role in fostering two-way exchanges [ 62 , 106 , 118 ]. The use of more formal methods typical of traditional science communication practices, i.e., through transfer of publications (data and information in various forms, e.g., peer-reviewed research papers) [ 119 – 122 ], often results in a transmission pathway, where conversations are limited between communicators and their audiences ( Fig 8 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organizations use social networking sites for stakeholder engagement and communication (Wang and Yang 2020 ). Strategic uses of social networking and stakeholder communication in online environments offer business value (Culnan et al 2010 ).…”
Section: Related Work and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%