2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.aipprr.2016.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnóstico macrosocial de riesgo del consumo de drogas en México

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimates from 2018 suggest that there are approximately 12,000 PWID in Tijuana; an estimate that is over ten times the national average for Mexico [6,7]. Tijuana is located along Mexico's north western border, a region which has the highest level of risk for substance use in the country [8], and substantially more heroin use when compared to other regions of Mexico [9]. Tijuana has also been the site of a concentrated HIV epidemic driven by risk behaviors like IDU and sex work, as well as the scarcity of services addressing these behaviors.…”
Section: Injection Drug Use In Tijuana Mexicomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Estimates from 2018 suggest that there are approximately 12,000 PWID in Tijuana; an estimate that is over ten times the national average for Mexico [6,7]. Tijuana is located along Mexico's north western border, a region which has the highest level of risk for substance use in the country [8], and substantially more heroin use when compared to other regions of Mexico [9]. Tijuana has also been the site of a concentrated HIV epidemic driven by risk behaviors like IDU and sex work, as well as the scarcity of services addressing these behaviors.…”
Section: Injection Drug Use In Tijuana Mexicomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tijuana has also been the site of a concentrated HIV epidemic driven by risk behaviors like IDU and sex work, as well as the scarcity of services addressing these behaviors. In addition, HIV prevalence in this area is estimated to be between 4.2 and 7.7% among PWID populations, and with approximately 30.5% of HIV cases among women [8,[10][11][12][13]. Furthermore, Tijuana serves as a key node along a drug trafficking corridor that supplies cocaine, opioids, and methamphetamine from Mexico into the United States and into Canada [14,15].…”
Section: Injection Drug Use In Tijuana Mexicomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the diagnostic studies that preceded the one presented here, the measurement indicators have shown variations since the conditions of the social context in which substance use takes place have also changed. Firstly, it should be noted that the number of urban municipalities in Mexico has altered with respect to the previous version of the study (García et al, 2016) because of demographic changes in Mexico, from 371 to 426. Moreover, certain information sources are no longer available or the level of specificity of their data has changed, from having municipal to state representativity or from state to regional representativity, such as the National Addictions Survey, the 2011 version of which (Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, & Secretaría de Salud, 2012) contains data at the regional level, while the previous survey (Secretaría de Salud, 2009), which included state data, is already too outdated to be considered as a parameter in this diagnosis.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, since 1997, the Centros de Integración Juvenil (CIJ) have conducted a risk diagnosis of drug use in municipalities and delegations in Mexico on the basis of macrosocial indicators. This project constitutes a second update of the study, "Macrosocial risks of drug dependence at the municipal level and strategic care network in Mexico," published in 1997 (Salinas et al, 1997), and first updated in 2011 (García, Rodríguez, Córdova, & Fernández, 2016). The results of these diagnoses have supported decision-making in the establishment of care units, at least at the CIJ, where three of the five units that have come into operation since the last study have been installed in municipalities classified as high-risk (García et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%