Diagnostic Procedures in Pancreatic Disease 1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-60580-2_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of Infected Pancreatic Necrosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent data shows overall mortality from mild and severe acute pancreatitis in the range of 15%. However, infection of pancreatic necrosis worsens the prognosis and triples the mortality rate [21][22][23]. We observed the typical biphasic mode in our SAP patients, with SIRS manifesting during the first 2 weeks and infectious complications developing from 3rd-4th week after onset of the disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Recent data shows overall mortality from mild and severe acute pancreatitis in the range of 15%. However, infection of pancreatic necrosis worsens the prognosis and triples the mortality rate [21][22][23]. We observed the typical biphasic mode in our SAP patients, with SIRS manifesting during the first 2 weeks and infectious complications developing from 3rd-4th week after onset of the disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Pancreatic infection basically occurs in patients with pancreatic or peripancreatic necrosis and/ or fluid collections. Pancreatic necrosis become infected in a percentage ranging from 20 to 70% and, as a rule, a time dependent increase of the infection rate with the duration of the disease is registered [4][5][6][7] (Figure 1). The late course of necrotizing pancreatitis is determined by bacterial infection of pancreatic and peripancreatic necrosis.…”
Section: Review Articlementioning
confidence: 91%
“…All patients with these features received treatment with antibiotics. Other multicentric, double blind, randomized trial comparing meronem and placebo showed no statistically significant difference between the treatment groups for pancreatic or peripancreatic infection, mortality or requirement for surgical intervention, and did not support early prophylactic antimicrobial use in patients with severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis [37] (Table 5) [4,18,32,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56].…”
Section: Antibiotic Prophylaxismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the patients are not substratified on the basis of extent of necrosis, that is recognized as being the main risk factor for the development of sepsis [1]. Finally, two-thirds of the patients under treatment changed the original antibiotic regimen within a mean period of 9 days.…”
Section: Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In severe pancreatitis the mortality rate is as high as 40% if pancreatic necrosis developed with infection [1]. Early diagnosis, treatment and, whenever possible, pre- vention of infections have become relevant endpoints of severe pancreatitis management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%