2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2004.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in dyspeptic patients by stool antigen detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the main differences are in specificity, while the specificity obtained by HpStAR was 70.7%, while HpSA specificity was 80.5%. Similar results were obtained by Calvet et al 25 who reported, in a evalua-tion of the HpSA and the FemtoLab tests using the faeces of dyspeptic patients, that there was a specificity of 76% using FemtoLab and 86% using HpSA. Previously, the same authors 26 had evaluated these kits in cirrhotic patients, obtaining specificities for HpSA and FemtoLab of 93% and 79%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, the main differences are in specificity, while the specificity obtained by HpStAR was 70.7%, while HpSA specificity was 80.5%. Similar results were obtained by Calvet et al 25 who reported, in a evalua-tion of the HpSA and the FemtoLab tests using the faeces of dyspeptic patients, that there was a specificity of 76% using FemtoLab and 86% using HpSA. Previously, the same authors 26 had evaluated these kits in cirrhotic patients, obtaining specificities for HpSA and FemtoLab of 93% and 79%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Stool specimens were received within 24 hr after collection and stored at -20 • C until tested for H. pylori antigen by the FemtoLab, Commex, Germany, a sandwich enzyme immunoassay, in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions [19]. Microtiter plate wells were coated with monoclonal antibodies for H. pylori antigen.…”
Section: H Pylori Antigen Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the sensitivity of PCR from stool specimens exceeds that of previously reported attempts [13]. Therefore, stool PCR may be considered as better test than HpSA because the HpSA test shows heterogeneity in the sensitivity rates that ranged from 58% to 96% and specificity ranged from 67% to96 % [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. This is because of the difficulty in obtaining polyclonal antibodies of constant quality [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%