2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of dermatophytosis: an evaluation of direct examination using MycetColor® and MycetFluo®

Abstract: Dermatophytes are an important cause of superficial fungal infection. Direct examination of skin, nail, or hair samples remains essential in diagnosis, as it provides a quick response to the clinician. However, mycological analysis, including direct examination and culture, often lacks sensitivity. The use of stains or fluorochromes may enhance the performance of direct examination. We analyzed 102 samples from patients with suspected dermatophytosis in 4 different diagnostic mycology laboratories. Two reagent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A common view among laboratory staff is that fluorescence microscopy is easier, faster and safer than bright‐field examination. This opinion is in line with a few comparative studies originating from departments of microbiology or dermatopathology . The potential advantages, however, in using fluorescence microscopy instead of light microscopy when screening for dermatophyte infections at a clinical level remains to be elucidated.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…A common view among laboratory staff is that fluorescence microscopy is easier, faster and safer than bright‐field examination. This opinion is in line with a few comparative studies originating from departments of microbiology or dermatopathology . The potential advantages, however, in using fluorescence microscopy instead of light microscopy when screening for dermatophyte infections at a clinical level remains to be elucidated.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Macroconidia suspension was taken from the grounded petri dish colony and centrifuged in peptol water suspension, which was resuspended with distilled water to obtain an even clearer suspension. Macroconidia was analyzed by Olympus optical CO microscope (400x magnification), Ltda BX40 (Tokyo, Japan) [17,18]…”
Section: Preparation and Standardization Of Dermatophytesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] The fluorescent method using CFW (calcofluor white) is a simple, rapid, highly efficient direct microscopy method that has a higher positive detection rate compared with KOH in various superficial fungal infectious diseases. 4,5 Several studies have compared CFW and other methods to diagnose suspected onychomycosis, but they did not show much better results with CFW. 6,7 Besides, the biggest disadvantages of CFW are that it diminishes quickly and its relatively bright back- brightener 85), a popular and widely used fluorescent brightener in wood, washing and dyeing industry in the world, in the detection of fungi in superficial fungal infectious diseases and proved that it had a higher positive rate than the KOH method with statistically significant differences (data not published).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reports have shown a relatively higher diagnostic positive rate using PAS (periodic acid‐Schiff), but it has seldom been used in clinical practice due to its time‐consuming nature compared with the KOH method . The fluorescent method using CFW (calcofluor white) is a simple, rapid, highly efficient direct microscopy method that has a higher positive detection rate compared with KOH in various superficial fungal infectious diseases . Several studies have compared CFW and other methods to diagnose suspected onychomycosis, but they did not show much better results with CFW .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%