2001
DOI: 10.1037/h0087129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Développement langagier et cognitif de l'enfant durant les trois premières années en relation avec la durée des vocalisations maternelles et les jouets présents dans l'environment: Étude longitudinale auprès de populations á risque.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding was later replicated with a similar study design in a larger sample of children (N = 63;Hoff & Naigles, 2002). Consistent results also emerged in a large-scale study (N = 209) in which other measures of maternal speech and child language were used from 0;3 to 3;0: Duration of maternal speech was computed as children interacted with their mother during short periods of free play in a laboratory setting, and child language comprehension and production were assessed with standardised tasks (Lacroix, Pomerleau, Malcuit, Séguin, & Lamarre, 2001). Results showed that duration of maternal speech at 0;6 and 1;6 was associated with later child language comprehension and production at 1;6, 2;0, 2;6, and 3;0.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding was later replicated with a similar study design in a larger sample of children (N = 63;Hoff & Naigles, 2002). Consistent results also emerged in a large-scale study (N = 209) in which other measures of maternal speech and child language were used from 0;3 to 3;0: Duration of maternal speech was computed as children interacted with their mother during short periods of free play in a laboratory setting, and child language comprehension and production were assessed with standardised tasks (Lacroix, Pomerleau, Malcuit, Séguin, & Lamarre, 2001). Results showed that duration of maternal speech at 0;6 and 1;6 was associated with later child language comprehension and production at 1;6, 2;0, 2;6, and 3;0.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…Another interpretation is that maternal speech as we measured it at 0;5 is indicative of stable features of maternal speech, and that concurrent maternal speech is what influenced child language at 1;6, 2;6, and 5;2. This latter interpretation seems particularly plausible given that maternal speech is relatively stable in the first years of life, as indicated by moderate to strong correlations across measures of quantity and word diversity from 0;3 to 3;0 (Lacroix et al, 2001;Song et al, 2014).…”
Section: The Influence Of Maternal Speech On Child Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although their scores were still in the normal range, they were significantly lower than the scores of infants of the low-risk group. Studies have shown that these lower end average scores in infants with social risk factors continue to diminish with time, reaching the borderline and retarded levels in the preschool years, when language items become more prominent in the tests (Burchinal et al, 1997;Lacroix et al, 2001;Sameroff et al, 1993). It is generally claimed that during the first year of life there is an unfolding of the genetic baggage and that the influence of socioenvironmental factors on cognitive development would appear only after this time (Bradley et al, 1989;Ramey, Owen Yates, & Short, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimal maternal interactions are characterized by frequent vocalizations (Olson et al, 1992;Stevenson Barratt & Roach, 1995). Children exposed to greater verbal stimulation are more likely to have better verbal comprehension and to produce more utterances later on (Lacroix, Pomerleau, Malcuit, Séguin, & Lamarre, 2001;Olson, Bates, & Bayles, 1984). Physical stimulation also helps an infant's development.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ceci entraînerait de la détresse psychologique chez les parents, diminuant leur capacité d'offrir un milieu stimulant et sensible aux besoins de leurs enfants (McLoyd, 1997(McLoyd, , 1998. La qualité de l'environnement familial, sur les plans physique et social, et la qualité des interactions entre les parents et l'enfant en seraient affectées (Brooks-Gunn, Klebanov, & Liaw, 1995;Hoff, 2003;Lacroix, Pomerleau, Malcuit, Séguin, & Lamarre, 2001;Roggman, Boyce, Cook, Christiansen, & Jones, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified