2002
DOI: 10.1086/338989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental Thresholds and the Evolution of Reaction Norms for Age and Size at Life‐History Transitions

Abstract: It is quite common in studies of life-history plasticity to find a negative relationship between the age at which various life-history transitions occur and the growth conditions under which individuals develop. In particular, high growth typically results in earlier transitions, often at a larger size. Here, we use a relatively general optimization model for age and size at life-history transitions to argue that current life-history theory cannot adequately explain these results. Specifically, most such theor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

30
302
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 290 publications
(337 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(117 reference statements)
30
302
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The first group of analyses tends to focus on single traits in a few environments (for a review see [4]) or at most two traits (e.g. [5,6]). These studies demonstrate the potential role of plasticity in generating or reducing variation in a trait among different environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first group of analyses tends to focus on single traits in a few environments (for a review see [4]) or at most two traits (e.g. [5,6]). These studies demonstrate the potential role of plasticity in generating or reducing variation in a trait among different environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the study of environmentally induced variation in the expression of life-history traits also plays a key role in understanding how changes in the environment are filtered through the biology of the organisms into changes in population dynamics (Laakso et al 2001;Beckerman et al 2002;Lindstrom & Kokko 2002). One of the most frequently studied reaction norms is the response of size and age at maturity to changes in an individual's growth conditions (Berrigan & Charnov 1994;Twombly 1996;Morey & Reznick 2000;Day & Rowe 2002). Age and size at maturity determines not only how quickly individuals in a population can start to reproduce but also how much they can reproduce, because fecundity is often closely associated with body size (Roff 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether the relationship between age and size at maturity is flat or negative in poor conditions will also depend upon the type of developmental threshold. A 'physical threshold' (Day & Rowe 2002) describes a minimum size or state that must be exceeded before the transition can be made. It has no effect on fecundity once it has been surpassed and therefore affects only those individuals in the population that experience poor growth conditions, generating a flat relationship between age and size at maturity in poor-growth environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prolonged larval growth, however, has associated costs, such as an increasing likelihood of natural host mortality and thus failed transmission. This trade-off between transitional size and age is the basis for many models on life-cycle evolution (Rowe and Ludwig, 1991 ;Stearns, 1992 ;Berrigan and Koella, 1994 ;Abrams et al 1996 ;Day and Rowe, 2002 ;Iwasa and Wada, 2006). If a large larval size is very advantageous, then continued growth may be worth the risk, perhaps even after parasites have reached an infective stage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%