2004
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age and size at maturity: sex, environmental variability and developmental thresholds

Abstract: In most organisms, transitions between different life-history stages occur later and at smaller sizes as growth conditions deteriorate. Day and Rowe recently proposed that this pattern could be explained by the existence of developmental thresholds (minimum sizes or levels of condition below which transitions are unable to proceed). The developmental-threshold model predicts that the reaction norm of age and size at maturity will rotate in an anticlockwise manner from positive to a shallow negative slope if: (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
94
2
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
94
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Juvenile growth rate influences the size and age at which individuals mature. The relationship between size and age at maturity is 'L' shaped (Beckerman et al 2003;Plaistow et al 2004), with fast growing individuals maturing at the same age (and varying in size) and slowgrowing individuals maturing at the minimum size (and varying in age; Plaistow et al 2004). In the low-density cohorts, individuals receive more food, grow faster and mature simultaneously and at a large size.…”
Section: Results (A) Reproductive Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Juvenile growth rate influences the size and age at which individuals mature. The relationship between size and age at maturity is 'L' shaped (Beckerman et al 2003;Plaistow et al 2004), with fast growing individuals maturing at the same age (and varying in size) and slowgrowing individuals maturing at the minimum size (and varying in age; Plaistow et al 2004). In the low-density cohorts, individuals receive more food, grow faster and mature simultaneously and at a large size.…”
Section: Results (A) Reproductive Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, juveniles experiencing a low-food environment mature after 14.3G0.3 days if their mothers also came from lowfood environments, but after 23.0G0.7 days if their mothers came from high-food environments (Plaistow et al 2004). To test whether these maternal effects were caused by changes in females' egg provisioning strategies, we reared groups of mites on different per capita food supplies.…”
Section: Results (A) Reproductive Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the developmental threshold (Day & Rowe 2002;Plaistow et al 2004). By plotting the size at metamorphosis as a function of the development time under different food conditions, an L-shaped reaction norm (following the terminology of Day & Rowe 2002) is predicted and also found in many systems (Morey & Reznick 2004;Plaistow et al 2004, but see Rudolf & Rö del 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, changes in photoperiod alter growth trajectories and can decouple life history and physiological traits (Rolff et al, 2004). Physiological parameters can be independent of size and age at maturity and thus may serve as independent targets of selection (Plaistow et al, 2004;Rolff et al, 2004). For example, damselflies developing under time constraints show reduced activity of phenoloxidase (PO), an important component of the insect immune system, but not changes in mass at emergence (Rolff et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%