2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12161-019-01512-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development, Optimization, and Validation of Methods for Quantification of Veterinary Drug Residues in Complex Food Matrices Using Liquid-Chromatography—A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be pointed out that targeted methods are often related to laborious extraction steps, which does not fully match a high throughput routine analysis. As for screening strategies, usually related to simpler sample extraction procedures, similar sensitivity and detection windows than quantification/confirmatory approaches should be delivered in order to prevent false negative results 25 . In this work, liquid–liquid extraction was selected to be evaluated for sample extraction using acetonitrile due to its known ability of extracting both polar and non‐polar compounds 25–27 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be pointed out that targeted methods are often related to laborious extraction steps, which does not fully match a high throughput routine analysis. As for screening strategies, usually related to simpler sample extraction procedures, similar sensitivity and detection windows than quantification/confirmatory approaches should be delivered in order to prevent false negative results 25 . In this work, liquid–liquid extraction was selected to be evaluated for sample extraction using acetonitrile due to its known ability of extracting both polar and non‐polar compounds 25–27 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for screening strategies, usually related to simpler sample extraction procedures, similar sensitivity and detection windows than quantification/confirmatory approaches should be delivered in order to prevent false negative results. 25 In this work, liquid-liquid extraction was selected to be evaluated for sample extraction using acetonitrile due to its known ability of extracting both polar and non-polar compounds. [25][26][27] The addition of NaCl was required to obtain a clear separation between the organic and the aqueous phases.…”
Section: Sample Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good linearity was obtained for all ATB and highly correlated with the amounts injected, the correlation coefficients (r 2 ) ranged from 0.997 to 0.999. The food matrix imposes a lot of interferences and the ability of the method to quantify a particular analyte despite all interferences is measured by the selectivity [36]. The application of the method to different blank milk samples demonstrated that no potential interferences from the matrix were detected at the retention time-windows of three analytes.…”
Section: Validation Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the residual content of veterinary drugs is very small and the polarity difference is large, [8,10] making it difficult for detection since the matrix effects can easily interfere with the result. [17] Conventional detection methods can only carry out quantitative detection of known objects, while they are poor in qualitative determination and deficient in screening suspect products. In order to solve these problems, mass spectrometric database is widely used for qualitative confirmation of suspect objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%