Development of the polygraph technique in Japan for detection of deception

Yamamura, Takeshi; Miyata, Yô

doi:10.1016/0379-0738(90)90256-x

Cited by 22 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A second method, known as the Concealed Information Test (CIT) or the Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT), has drawn considerable attention among researchers, but has been extensively applied only in Japan (Fukumoto, 1980;Nakayama, 2002;Yamamura and Miyata, 1990). There is a general consensus that the CIT does rely on solid scientific principles and incorporates proper control questions (e.g., BenShakhar et al, 2002;Ben-Shakhar and Elaad, 2002;Ben-Shakhar and Furedy, 1990;Lykken, 1974Lykken, , 1998.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of context and state of guilt on the detection of concealed crime information

Elaad

2009

International Journal of Psychophysiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of context and state of guilt on the detection of concealed crime information

Elaad

2009

International Journal of Psychophysiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The CIT has become standard criminal procedure in Japan (Hira and Furumitsu, 2002;Nakayama, 2002;Yamamura and Miyata, 1990). However, it is not very often applied elsewhere.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of perceived reliability and generalization of crime-related information on detection in the concealed information test

Elaad

2010

International Journal of Psychophysiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…An alternative method, known as the Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT), or the Concealed Information Test (CIT), has drawn considerable attention among researchers, but has been extensively applied only in Japan (Fukumoto, 1980;Nakayama, 2002;Yamamura & Miyata, 1990). Its lack of popularity in applied settings is probably because of its being much harder to implement than the CQT (Podlesny, 1993).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Estimating the Validity of the Guilty Knowledge Test From Simulated Experiments: The External Validity of Mock Crime Studies.

Carmel¹,

Dayan²,

A³

et al. 2003

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

103

134

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This experiment was designed to examine the external validity of the standard mock-crime procedure used extensively to evaluate the validity of polygraph tests. The authors manipulated the type of mock-crime procedure (standard vs. a more realistic version) and the time of test (immediate vs. delayed) and examined their effects on the validity of the Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT) and the recall rate of the relevant items. The results indicated that only the type of mock-crime affected the 2 outcome variables. The realistic procedure was associated with a lower recall rate and weaker detection efficiency than the standard procedure. However, these effects were mediated by the type of GKT questions used. Practical implications of these results are discussed.

show abstract

Development of the polygraph technique in Japan for detection of deception

Cited by 22 publications

References 6 publications

Effects of context and state of guilt on the detection of concealed crime information

Effects of context and state of guilt on the detection of concealed crime information

Effects of perceived reliability and generalization of crime-related information on detection in the concealed information test

Estimating the Validity of the Guilty Knowledge Test From Simulated Experiments: The External Validity of Mock Crime Studies.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About