2019
DOI: 10.3390/ma12071035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Heavyweight Self-Compacting Concrete and Ambient-Cured Heavyweight Geopolymer Concrete Using Magnetite Aggregates

Abstract: Heavyweight self-compacting concrete (HWSCC) and heavyweight geopolymer concrete (HWGC) are new types of concrete that integrate the advantages of heavyweight concrete (HWC) with self-compacting concrete (SCC) and geopolymer concrete (GC), respectively. The replacement of natural coarse aggregates with magnetite aggregates in control SCC and control GC at volume ratios of 50%, 75%, and 100% was considered in this study to obtain heavyweight concrete classifications, according to British standards, which provid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The segregation resistance is often considered as the index of stability of SCC, which also can be classified as static stability and dynamic stability. At present, the evaluation and test methods of the workability of SCC mainly includes a slump flow (SF) test incorporating slump flow time (T500) measurements [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], a V-funnel test [14,15,17,[19][20][21][22]24,26], a L-box test [13,15,19,21,23,24,26], a U-shape meter test [14,17,22], and a J-ring test [15][16][17][18][19]24,25], etc. Stability tests conducted for SCC mixture involved a sieve analysis test [15,17,20,25], flow table test [27], segregation probe test [20], and static settlement column test…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The segregation resistance is often considered as the index of stability of SCC, which also can be classified as static stability and dynamic stability. At present, the evaluation and test methods of the workability of SCC mainly includes a slump flow (SF) test incorporating slump flow time (T500) measurements [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], a V-funnel test [14,15,17,[19][20][21][22]24,26], a L-box test [13,15,19,21,23,24,26], a U-shape meter test [14,17,22], and a J-ring test [15][16][17][18][19]24,25], etc. Stability tests conducted for SCC mixture involved a sieve analysis test [15,17,20,25], flow table test [27], segregation probe test [20], and static settlement column test…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that with the increase of slag content, the self-compacting performance of concrete gradually reduces, and when the replacement rate is low, the self-compacting performance of concrete still remains. Valizadeh et al [18] used magnetite aggregate to replace the natural coarse aggregate of SCC and general concrete with the volume ratio of 50%, 75% and 100% in the study of heavyweight SCC. The slump test and J-ring test results show that the workability of fresh concrete decreases gradually with the increase of the amount of magnetite aggregate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, raw materials of geopolymer are mostly by-products of industrial products with abundant reserves and low prices. Compared with OPC, geopolymers have better mechanical, chemical, thermal properties, and durability [6,[8][9][10][11][12]. Based on the above-mentioned characteristics, geopolymer is a better option for the development of sustainable products such as building materials, fire-retardant coatings, fiber-reinforced composite materials, and fixed solutions for chemical and nuclear industrial wastes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explain the observed trend, the higher water absorption capacity of heavyweight aggregate rather than normal weight aggregate, 8 and more compact microstructure 10 are the key parameters. However, at lower w/c ratios, by increasing the magnetite aggregate (up to 50% for w/c ratio equal to 0.25, and 75% for w/c ratio equal to 0.2), and subsequently increasing density, the compressive strength would reduce comparing to the control samples, indicating that higher water absorption capacity of heavyweight aggregates is an inhibitor for propagation of the internal structure of the concrete (calcium‐silicate‐hydrate gel) and gaining strength 46–48 . Notwithstanding, 100% magnetite content would increase the compressive strength even at lower w/c ratio which may be contributed to the more compact microstructure of the concrete 10 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%