2002
DOI: 10.1007/s001700200162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Empirical Models for Surface Roughness Prediction in Finish Turning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
58
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the data mining approach [39][40][41][42], carry out three variables functions approximation based on experimental data with the help of the neural network.…”
Section: And Step Twomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the data mining approach [39][40][41][42], carry out three variables functions approximation based on experimental data with the help of the neural network.…”
Section: And Step Twomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suresh et al (2002) concluded that genetic algorithms can be applied to determine minimum and maximum values of surface roughness and hence, optimum machining conditions. Feng and Wang (2002) reported that surface quality influenced the properties like wear resistance and friction of machined parts. Kirby et al (2004) developed a model to predict surface roughness in turning operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The techniques employed include response surface methodology (RSM) combined with factorial design approach [11], RSM combined with data extracted from workpiece surface profile simulated from images of tool inserts [12], statistical models based on experimental data [13] and artificial neural network-based methodologies [14][15][16]. Hessainia et al [17] developed a surface roughness model in hard turning by exploiting the response surface model.…”
Section: Sung Loh Ratnam: Simulation Approach For Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%