2016
DOI: 10.2507/ijsimm15(1)4.320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation Approach for Surface Roughness Interval Prediction in Finish Turning

Abstract: Existing simulation models used in predicting the surface roughness of a workpiece in finish turning are based on an ideal circular cutting tool nose profile. This leads to a single predicted roughness value for a given set of input parameters. In this paper, a simulation approach that considers the random tool nose profile micro-deviations as well as the tool chatter vibration to predict a roughness interval is proposed. The nose profiles used in the simulation were extracted from images of the real cutting t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the existence of tool edge waviness on the cutting tool edge, deviations between the circular arc surface topography and the actual surface topography are unavoidable. For instance, Sung et al once adopted a high-resolution optical system to capture the image of an active tool nose profile, and their investigations show that the deviation of the tool nose profile, i.e., the tool edge waviness, alone can cause the surface roughness to vary in a large extent [26,27]. As shown in Figure 2a, the hollow square is the simulated peak-valley surface roughness R t with consideration of tool edge waviness; and the straight line is the nominal peak-valley surface roughness R t = f 2 /8 r ε without consideration of tool edge waviness.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the existence of tool edge waviness on the cutting tool edge, deviations between the circular arc surface topography and the actual surface topography are unavoidable. For instance, Sung et al once adopted a high-resolution optical system to capture the image of an active tool nose profile, and their investigations show that the deviation of the tool nose profile, i.e., the tool edge waviness, alone can cause the surface roughness to vary in a large extent [26,27]. As shown in Figure 2a, the hollow square is the simulated peak-valley surface roughness R t with consideration of tool edge waviness; and the straight line is the nominal peak-valley surface roughness R t = f 2 /8 r ε without consideration of tool edge waviness.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major significant indicator of surface quality is surface roughness [6,7]. It is well-known that by increasing the tool tip radius rε, the quality of machined surface increases.…”
Section: Cutting By Straight Cutting Edgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large amount of different problems in the field of steel casting, forming, and batch planning in steel industry were studied so far by the use of evolutionary computation methods including genetic programming, e.g. [26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Genetic Programming Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%