2018
DOI: 10.33225/jbse/18.17.812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of CCDSR Teaching Model to Improve Science Process Skills of Pre-Service Physics Teachers

Abstract: CCDSR teaching model is physics teaching with the scientific activities by design to improve science process skills and its learning. This research was conducted to develop and produce a qualified CCDSR teaching model to improve the science process skills of pre-service physics teachers. The analysis of CCDSR teaching models’ quality was done by using mean validity score, Cronbach’s coefficient alpha, Paired t-test, N-gain, and ANOVA test. The results showed that the CCDSR teaching model was proved to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, there is a significant difference between pretest and posttest (there is an increase) of student learning outcomes about the matter in geometry of molecules. This shows that media that meet the n-gain value in the medium or high category can improve and achieve learning goals (Limatahu et al, 2018). It means that 100% of students experience an increase in learning outcomes when viewed from the value of the pretest and posttest.…”
Section: T Y Destari and R Hidayahmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Overall, there is a significant difference between pretest and posttest (there is an increase) of student learning outcomes about the matter in geometry of molecules. This shows that media that meet the n-gain value in the medium or high category can improve and achieve learning goals (Limatahu et al, 2018). It means that 100% of students experience an increase in learning outcomes when viewed from the value of the pretest and posttest.…”
Section: T Y Destari and R Hidayahmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Table 1 shows the PBLA validator evaluation criteria. (Kusumawati et al, 2015) The effectiveness of PBLA for enhancing student learning was evaluated in the following order with pre-test results: (1) paired t-test or Wilcoxon for non-parametric tests (Gibbons & Chakraborti, 2014); (2) determine the n-gain by the equation: n-gain = (posttest-pretest)⁄(100pretest), with criteria: (a) if n-gain ≥ .70 (high), (b) if .30 < n-gain < .70 (moderate), and (c) if n-gain n-gain ≤ .30 (low) (Sundayana, 2014;Limatahu & Prahani , 2018); and (3) the two average similarity test or the Mann Whitney U-test for non-parametric format (Gibbons & Chakraborti, 2014.…”
Section: Analysis Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salah satu masalah yang saat ini tengah dialami dunia pendidikan ialah rendahnya kualitas pendidikan di Indonesia akibat lemahnya proses pembelajaran [1]. Salah satu upaya yang dilakukan pemerintah untuk meningkatkan mutu pendidikan adalah dengan mengembangkan kurikulum 2013, yang bertujuan untuk mempersiapkan manusia Indonesia agar beriman, produktif, kreatif, inovatif dan afektif serta mampu berkontribusi pada kehidupan masyarakat, berbangsa, bernegara dan peradaban dunia.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified