Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference - ACC'95
DOI: 10.1109/acc.1995.532724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a stochastic predictive PID controller

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tuffs in 1987 [3], [5], [13], can be applied to the adaptive controls when the system parameter have the variety, time delay and can find out the best PID control parameters with this method [4], [5], [6], [8], [10]. The main control method introduce as follow:…”
Section: Gpc (General Predictive Control) Control Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tuffs in 1987 [3], [5], [13], can be applied to the adaptive controls when the system parameter have the variety, time delay and can find out the best PID control parameters with this method [4], [5], [6], [8], [10]. The main control method introduce as follow:…”
Section: Gpc (General Predictive Control) Control Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PID, as the most popular controller of simple fi xed structure in the fi eld, is not synthesized from process or disturbance model, and therefore subject to the question: How close do PID controllers achieve ideal performance in term of minimum variance under stochastic disturbance? To achieve such a goal, Miller et al (1995) and Kowk et al (2000) derived the stochastic discrete predictive PID control law by approximating the generalized predictive control (GPC) with steady-state weighting. Based on generalized minimum variance control (GMVC), some self-tuning PID schemes (Miura et al, 1998;Yamamoto et al, 1999;Sato et al, 2002) have been proposed for discrete-time systems in face of stochastic disturbances.…”
Section: State-space Digital Pi Controller Design For Linear Stochastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yamamoto et al [2] explored a design of self-tuning PID controllers with minimization of a generalized control cost function, and theoretically proved its closed-loop stability. Furthermore, Miller et al [3] studied the development of a stochastic predictive PID controller. Omatu, Lu and Tsai and other authors in [4][5][6][7] proposed an adaptive generalized minimized variance temperature control based on the predictive model, and deduced a self-tuning PID control for the plants modeled by the second-order models with time delay, and then obtained satisfactory properties for plastic injection molding temperature control process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…INTRODUCTION PID control has the benefits of simple structure, robustness, and easy tuning, and has been widely used as a prevalence control method in industry [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Over present and past decades, self-tuning PID control has been extensively developed and has also been shown to have four features, including (i) it can be used to eliminate errors from an incorrect model, or a model with parameter variations and external disturbances; (ii) it can achieve good control performance for a wide range of control systems; (iii) it can be robust against modeling error and parameter variations; (iv) it can be applicable to systems with having variable time-delay, non-minimum phase or open-loop unstable properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation