2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11029-007-0002-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a finite-element analysis methodology for the propagation of delaminations in composite structures

Abstract: Analysing the collapse of skin-stiffened structures requires capturing the critical phenomenon of skin-stiffener separation, which can be considered analogous to interlaminar cracking. This paper presents the development of a numerical approach for simulating the propagation of interlaminar cracks in composite structures. A degradation methodology was introduced in MSC.Marc, which involved the modelling of a structure with shell layers connected by user-defined multiple-point constraints (MPCs). User subrouti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The iterative approach was developed as it was found that a simple fail-release method led to violation of the assumption of self-similar growth. The prediction of interlaminar crack growth was validated using fracture mechanics characterisation specimens, including mode I double cantilever beam (DCB), 5 mode II end notched flexure, 6 mode III edge crack torsion, 1 and mode I-II mixed-mode bending (MMB). 6 From these specimens, the crack growth degradation model with the iterative propagation method was shown to be capable of accurately representing specimen behaviour under single and mixed-mode crack growth.…”
Section: Analysis Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The iterative approach was developed as it was found that a simple fail-release method led to violation of the assumption of self-similar growth. The prediction of interlaminar crack growth was validated using fracture mechanics characterisation specimens, including mode I double cantilever beam (DCB), 5 mode II end notched flexure, 6 mode III edge crack torsion, 1 and mode I-II mixed-mode bending (MMB). 6 From these specimens, the crack growth degradation model with the iterative propagation method was shown to be capable of accurately representing specimen behaviour under single and mixed-mode crack growth.…”
Section: Analysis Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Virtual Crack Closure Technique (VCCT) is certainly the most popular method for computing the modes of the energy release rate (GI, GII, GIII) needed for estimating the onset of delamination [2][3][4][5][6]. A specific Virtual Crack Extension method (VCE), based on [12], is presented here as an alternative to VCCT.…”
Section: Solution Procedures For Assessing Damage Tolerance In Composmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most dangerous crack and the propagation load are then predicted according to criteria such as those given in equation (1), where GIc, GIIc and GIIIc are the fracture toughness for each mode. With this approach crack growth analysis remains difficult to simulate and recent references only propose specific solutions for simple 3D configurations with a single crack front [2][3][4][5][6]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…straight or circular/elliptical -2/35-when modelled by using orthogonal meshes with edges parallel or orthogonal to the delamination front). When the delamination growth is of concern, the VCCT can be used in conjunction with interface elements [5][6][7] or with a fail release approach [8][9][10] whose effect is that to simulate the growth process by releasing constraints between crack faces when the Strain Energy Release Rate level overcomes critical values (instantaneous propagation). However, during the propagation the delamination front may assume complex and non-smoothed shapes with corners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mabson et al [5] emphasized the tendency for corner nodes to accumulate energy in a Double Cantilever Beam specimen and than to be smoothed thus inducing to a misleading prediction of the shape of the delamination front. Orifici et al [8] analysed the delamination growth in an analogous specimen by using four different approaches and individuating the best correlation between numerical and experimental results in terms of growth rate when weight factors were introduced in VCCT formulae. These weight factors were not predetermined as in Ref.11 but computed taking into account the shape of the local crack front created when constraints are released.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%