2010
DOI: 10.1142/s0219455410003671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis Tool for Design and Certification of Postbuckling Composite Aerospace Structures

Abstract: In aerospace, carbon fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) materials and postbuckling skin-stiffened structures are key technologies that have been used to improve structural efficiency. However, the application of composite postbuckling structures in aircraft has been limited as today's analysis tools cannot accurately predict structural collapse in compression. In this work, a finite element analysis tool for design and certification of aerospace structures is presented, which predicts collapse by taking the criti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An analysis methodology was developed to predict the collapse of stiffened composite structures in compression that is focused on capturing the effects of the critical damage mechanisms. The approach contains several aspects: predicting the initiation of interlaminar damage in intact structures; capturing in-plane degradation such as fibre fracture and matrix cracking; capturing the propagation of a pre-existing interlaminar damage region [7][8].…”
Section: Analysis Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis methodology was developed to predict the collapse of stiffened composite structures in compression that is focused on capturing the effects of the critical damage mechanisms. The approach contains several aspects: predicting the initiation of interlaminar damage in intact structures; capturing in-plane degradation such as fibre fracture and matrix cracking; capturing the propagation of a pre-existing interlaminar damage region [7][8].…”
Section: Analysis Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More detailed design studies or analysis in comparison with experimental results should consider material failure, and ideally capture the progression of all critical damage modes. This has previously been demonstrated by the authors [11,12], where accurate predictions and detailed design studies of composite postbuckling panels were achieved using a progressive damage analysis methodology.…”
Section: Perturbation Analysismentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Alternatively, the use of a database of known imperfection patterns has been proposed as a means of assessing the sensitivity of a design using numerical analysis [7]. Other approaches involve taking into account non-traditional imperfections such as those involving the loading or material [8], the use of statistics-based techniques [9,10], or progressive damage modelling [11,12]. However, for these approaches, the appropriate parameters to apply are often not known a priori for a given structure and manufacturing process, so that experimental testing would be required for validation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This led to the establishment of some reliable and modified guidelines based on the experimental results [8,24]. Nowadays, the non-destructive methods have attracted great interest among researchers to evaluate the actual buckling behaviors of cylindrical shells considering various geometrical imperfections [9,16,26]. Based on the reported literatures, it is concluded that the various approaches and guidelines which have been developed to predict realistic buckling loads have a lot of limitations in the shape of structure and their accuracy are dependent on the type and amplitude of imperfection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%