2022
DOI: 10.3390/toxins14070454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of an Automated Magneto-Controlled Pretreatment for Chromatography-Free Detection of Aflatoxin B1 in Cereals and Oils through Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy

Abstract: A chromatography-free detection of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) in cereals and oils through atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) has been developed using quantum dots and immunomagnetic beads. A magneto-controlled pretreatment platform for automatic purification, labeling, and digestion was constructed, and AFB1 detection through AAS was enabled. Under optimal conditions, this immunoassay exhibited high sensitivity for AFB1 detection, with limits of detection as low as 0.04 μg/kg and a linear dynamic range of 2.5–240 μ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…QDs-based sensors can adopt different working mechanisms and be applied to detect different substances, including AF S in edible oil [ 51 , 173 , 238 ]. According to the characteristics of QDs, Xuan et al [ 185 ] and Ye et al [ 241 ] developed and constructed different magnetic control pretreatment platforms, which were actually applied to the detection of AFB 1 in peanut oil and agricultural products, and both showed good detection characteristics. Other researchers used a quencher system composed of quantum dots and graphene oxide to detect AFB 1 in peanut oil, which also showed good detection characteristics [ 242 ].…”
Section: Methods For Detecting Afb 1 In Edible Oilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QDs-based sensors can adopt different working mechanisms and be applied to detect different substances, including AF S in edible oil [ 51 , 173 , 238 ]. According to the characteristics of QDs, Xuan et al [ 185 ] and Ye et al [ 241 ] developed and constructed different magnetic control pretreatment platforms, which were actually applied to the detection of AFB 1 in peanut oil and agricultural products, and both showed good detection characteristics. Other researchers used a quencher system composed of quantum dots and graphene oxide to detect AFB 1 in peanut oil, which also showed good detection characteristics [ 242 ].…”
Section: Methods For Detecting Afb 1 In Edible Oilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a chromatography-free method was found in the literature for the detection of AFB1 in cereals and oils through atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) using quantum dots and immunomagnetic beads. A magneto-controlled pre-treatment platform for automatic purification, labeling, and digestion was constructed and AFB1 detection through AAS was enabled using the proposed immunoassay which exhibits high sensitivity for AFB1 detection in wheat and maize, with a LOD of 0.04 µg/kg [ 119 ].…”
Section: Instrumental Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the AFB 1 in the sample extract was first purified by IMBs prior to competitively binding with QDs‐labeled AFB 1 antigens, this pretreatment system demonstrated exceptional specificity. Following this procedure, AFB 1 concentration was obtained by directly quantifying the signal probes (namely, Cd 2+ resulting from the acid digestion of QDs) using atomic absorption spectrometer (Ye et al., 2022) (Figure 5d). Furthermore, the indirect quantification of Cd 2+ through the electrochemical technique resulted in signal amplification and a wider linear range (0.08–800 vs. 2.5–240 µg/kg) (Xuan et al., 2020).…”
Section: Roles and Applications Of Mnps In Mycotoxin Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those platforms shall effectively mitigate the impact of matrix effects and eliminate the need for labor‐intensive manual processing. Consequently, they streamline the processes of purifying, competitively binding, and releasing signals for mycotoxin detection (Xuan et al., 2020; Ye et al., 2022; Zhang, Liu et al., 2022). Wang's group utilized an in‐house, automatic platform to reduce the signal interference arising from cereal and oil samples (specifically wheat, corn, maize, husked rice, and peanut oil), which adopted IMBs as capture probes and QDs as signal probes.…”
Section: Roles and Applications Of Mnps In Mycotoxin Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%