2015
DOI: 10.2174/1573397111666150522093712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of a Patient Reported Experience Measure (PREM) for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and other Rheumatic Conditions

Abstract: The RA PREM and the modified PREM provide new valuable validated tools for capturing the patient experience in a range of rheumatic conditions. The RA PREM is currently being used in a UK National Clinical Audit of Rheumatoid and Early Inflammatory Arthritis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that some questions are redundant within domains. However, our results for internal consistency did not differ from the original development study, both in RA patients (α = 0.65 to α = 0.93 (DREAM-RA) versus α = 0.61 to α = 0.90) and in SpA patients (α = 0.70 to α = 0.90 (SpA-Net) versus α = 0.76 to α = 0.91) [10]. Interpretability of the CQRA-PREM showed ceiling effects for the domains needs and preferences, daily living and physical comfort, and emotional support, which implies that the interpretability of the CQRA-PREM is not valid enough.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This suggests that some questions are redundant within domains. However, our results for internal consistency did not differ from the original development study, both in RA patients (α = 0.65 to α = 0.93 (DREAM-RA) versus α = 0.61 to α = 0.90) and in SpA patients (α = 0.70 to α = 0.90 (SpA-Net) versus α = 0.76 to α = 0.91) [10]. Interpretability of the CQRA-PREM showed ceiling effects for the domains needs and preferences, daily living and physical comfort, and emotional support, which implies that the interpretability of the CQRA-PREM is not valid enough.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…Answers are given on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree" (online resources 1 and 2) [15]. Detailed information on the development and validation of the CQRA-PREM can be found elsewhere [10].…”
Section: Prem Translationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There is an increased emphasis in Europe on measures of patient experience as health care quality indicators across different medical disciplines. PREMs have been widely used and integrated in the evaluation of quality of care for chronic heart failure, 18 mental health, 17 diabetes, asthma, and rheumatoid arthritis, 19 in emergency care services, 20 and to measure patients’ experience with medicine use. 21 The NAIC in England and Wales has included PREMs designed specifically for IC since 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%