BackgroundEvidence from studies conducted in Western countries indicates that a significant proportion of hospital beds are occupied by patients who experience a delayed hospital discharge (DHD). However, evidence about this topic is lacking in Italy, and little is known on the patients’ and organisational characteristics that influence DHDs. Therefore, we carried out a survey in all the hospitals of a Northern Italian region to analyse the prevalence and the determinants of DHD.MethodsA cross-sectional study was carried out during an index period of 15 days in 256 operative units in Emilia-Romagna, a Northern Italian region with 4.4 million inhabitants, to identify patients medically fit for discharge but still hospitalised. The characteristics of these patients (n = 510) were compared with all the other patients (n = 5,815) hospitalised in the same operative units during the index period using multilevel logistic regression models.ResultsThe one-day prevalence of DHD was 8.1%. More than half of DHD patients (52.7%) waited to access long-term/rehabilitation units or residential care homes, 16.7% experienced a delay for family-related reasons, and 14.5% were waiting to be admitted to other rehabilitation services. Among DHD patients hospitalised in long-term/rehabilitation units, 45.3% were waiting to be transferred to residential care homes. Patients’ characteristics associated with a higher likelihood of DHD in multilevel logistic regression were older age, provision of intensive care, a diagnosis of dementia, tumours or femoral/shoulder fractures, and a number of comorbidities. Patients hospitalised in long-term/rehabilitation units, as well as in orthopaedics/traumatology units, were significantly more likely to have a DHD compared with patients hospitalised in general surgery units. Moreover, compared with Local Health Authority Hospitals, being hospitalised in Hospital Trusts was associated with a higher likelihood of DHD.ConclusionsAlthough the prevalence of DHD in the present study is markedly lower than that reported in the literature, we submit that the DHD problem should be addressed with major organisational innovations, with a special focus on the ageing of the population and epidemiological trends. Organisational changes imply new ways of managing emerging clusters of patients whose needs are not efficiently or effectively met by traditional organisation models and services.

Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 SSRI or SNRI versus placebo, Outcome 2 Withdrawals-any reason.. .. .. .. Analysis 1.3. Comparison 1 SSRI or SNRI versus placebo, Outcome 3 Withdrawals due to adverse events.. .. . Analysis 1.4. Comparison 1 SSRI or SNRI versus placebo, Outcome 4 Number of patients with minor adverse events. Analysis 2.1. Comparison 2 SSRI or SNRI versus another active drug (amitriptyline), Outcome 1 Migraine frequency

Since the last version of this review, the new included studies have not added high quality evidence to support the use of SSRIs or venlafaxine (a SNRI) as preventive drugs for tension-type headache. Over two months of treatment, SSRIs or venlafaxine are no more effective than placebo or amitriptyline in reducing headache frequency in patients with chronic tension-type headache. SSRIs seem to be less effective than tricyclic antidepressants in terms of intake of analgesic medications. Tricyclic antidepressants are associated with more adverse events; however, this did not cause a greater number of withdrawals. No reliable information is available at longer follow-up. Our conclusion is that the use of SSRIs and venlafaxine for the prevention of chronic tension-type headache is not supported by evidence.

BackgroundIntermediate care (IC) services are a key component of integrated care for elderly people, providing a link between hospital and home through provision of rehabilitation and health and social care. The Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) are designed to measure user experience of care in IC settings.ObjectiveTo examine the feasibility and the scaling properties of the Italian version of PREMs questionnaires for use in IC services.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted on consecutive users of 1 home-based and 4 bed-based IC services in Emilia-Romagna (Italy). The main outcome measure was the PREMs questionnaire results. PREMs for each home- and bed-based IC services were translated, back-translated, and adapted through consensus among the members of the advisory board and pilot testing of face validity in 15 patients. A total of 199 questionnaires were returned from users of bed-based services and 185 were returned by mail from users of home-based services. The return rates and responses were examined. Mokken analysis was used to examine the scaling properties of the PREMs.ResultsAnalysis performed on the bed-based PREMs (N=154) revealed that 13 items measured the same construct and formed a moderate-strength scale (Loevinger H=0.488) with good reliability (Cronbach’s alpha =0.843). Analysis of home-based PREMs (N=134 records) revealed that 15 items constituted a strong scale (Loevinger H=0.543) with good reliability (Cronbach’s alpha =0.875).ConclusionThe Italian versions of the bed- and home-based IC-PREMs questionnaires proved to be valid and reliable tools to assess patients’ experience of care. Future plans include monitoring user experience over time in the same facilities and in other Italian IC settings for between-service benchmarking.

No abstract

Issue Fragility is a major challenge that demand a comprehensive public health response, since a high rate of population is aging and becoming vulnerable. Description of the Problem The Local Health Authority of Bologna, about 850,000 inhabitants, has implemented a new qualitative and quantitative Project on fragile patients. Frailty was measured by the “Risk Profile of the Emilia-Romagna region,”, an algorithm that provides a risk index, based on patients'record, which divide population in risk categories (high/very high, moderate and low risk) of hospitalization. The 585 General Practitioners (GPs) have enrolled their fragile patients with high and very high risk (about 6% of the population). GPs and other healthcare professionals are asked to define an Individualized Care Plan (ICP) according to an integrated and multi-professional management perspective. Patients' and healthcare professionals' subjective experience was collected throughout a structured interview. Results From October 2018 to April 2019, 260 patients were included in the project and they received a ICP which included different interventions such as: integrated nursing care (105), nursing care in chronic ambulatory (55), community hospital care (9), social assistance (92), physiotherapy (88), specialist activities (114). Qualitative data highlighted high level of satisfaction both in patients and clinicians. The strengths of the Project are: 1) an integrated management (with a multi- professional team) of frailty population, 2) proactive and individualized treatment plan. Limitations are: 1) different approaches among clinicians in the Local Health Authority of Bologna with possible inequalities of accessibility to the treatment; 2) difficulties in the relationships among clinicians. The early recognition and the specialistic management of the fragile population have to be considered a priority in health practice in order to provide effective medical intervention. Key messages Individualized Care Plan (ICP) and integrated and multi-professional management. Importance of fragility early recognition.