2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(99)00162-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of a monoclonal antibody blocking elisa for the detection of antibodies against both equine herpesvirus type 1 (EHV1) and equine herpesvirus type 4 (EHV4)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The necessity to examine undiluted as well as diluted samples in a similar blocking assay was recently described for horse sera containing antibodies to equine arteritis virus (Cho et al., 2000). Using flow cytometry or immunofluoresence microscopy for such an assay might sound inconvenient when compared with an ELISA format as has been described for the serological discrimination of a number of pathogens including viruses, bacteria, parasites, fungi or antitoxins (Hall et al., 1995; Kolbe and Clough, 1999; Garringer et al., 2000; van Maanen et al., 2000; Nugent et al., 2000; Saliki and Lehenbauer, 2001). This is especially true because ELISA readers are considered to be part of any diagnostic laboratory in the world where the former two equipments are not that ubiquitously available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The necessity to examine undiluted as well as diluted samples in a similar blocking assay was recently described for horse sera containing antibodies to equine arteritis virus (Cho et al., 2000). Using flow cytometry or immunofluoresence microscopy for such an assay might sound inconvenient when compared with an ELISA format as has been described for the serological discrimination of a number of pathogens including viruses, bacteria, parasites, fungi or antitoxins (Hall et al., 1995; Kolbe and Clough, 1999; Garringer et al., 2000; van Maanen et al., 2000; Nugent et al., 2000; Saliki and Lehenbauer, 2001). This is especially true because ELISA readers are considered to be part of any diagnostic laboratory in the world where the former two equipments are not that ubiquitously available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve serological diagnosis, we developed a rapid, reproducible and sensitive monoclonal antibody blocking ELISA for the detection of antibodies against EHV1 and EHV4. This ELISA is easy to perform, economic in use of reagents and does not require the use of both EHV1 and EHV4 strains for serological diagnosis of an EHV1 or EHV4 infection (171). Moreover, this ELISA appeared to be more sensitive than a homologous VN test to detect responses after EHV1/4 infections early in life and after experimental infections (171).…”
Section: Additional Comments On Serodiagnosis Of Ehv1 and Ehv4 Infectmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Blocking ELISA, a specific method for antibody detection, has been used widely to diagnose human diseases [18], monitor animal infectious diseases [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], and detect viral antibodies in clinics or laboratories [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29]. The distinct advantages of blocking ELISA include high-volume sample testing, applicability across multiple species, and greater objectivity than some traditional techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%