2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.01.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and temporal organization of compulsive checking induced by repeated injections of the dopamine agonist quinpirole in an animal model of obsessive-compulsive disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
88
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
88
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with previous research, which has established that repeated exposure to quinpirole produces a characteristic response pattern in rats that includes an initial suppression of locomotor activity, followed by a gradual increase in activity over several days (Foley, Fudge, Kavaliers, & Ossenkopp 2006). This is known as behavioral sensitization, wherein the behavioral response to a given dose of quinpirole tends to increase across repeated exposure to the drug (Dvorkin, Perreault, & Szechtman, 2006). When rates of lever pressing were pooled across sessions and the baseline and operant phases were compared, the drug-treated animals displayed fewer presses per day during the operant phase (M ¼ 260.24, SD ¼ 80.12) than during the baseline phase (M ¼ 397.73, SD ¼ 42.26), as a result of the initial suppression of locomotor activity that occurs when drug-naive animals are first exposed to quinpirole, paired-samples t test, t(11) ¼ 5.62, p < .001.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is consistent with previous research, which has established that repeated exposure to quinpirole produces a characteristic response pattern in rats that includes an initial suppression of locomotor activity, followed by a gradual increase in activity over several days (Foley, Fudge, Kavaliers, & Ossenkopp 2006). This is known as behavioral sensitization, wherein the behavioral response to a given dose of quinpirole tends to increase across repeated exposure to the drug (Dvorkin, Perreault, & Szechtman, 2006). When rates of lever pressing were pooled across sessions and the baseline and operant phases were compared, the drug-treated animals displayed fewer presses per day during the operant phase (M ¼ 260.24, SD ¼ 80.12) than during the baseline phase (M ¼ 397.73, SD ¼ 42.26), as a result of the initial suppression of locomotor activity that occurs when drug-naive animals are first exposed to quinpirole, paired-samples t test, t(11) ¼ 5.62, p < .001.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…EthoVision 3.1 software was used to extract the time series of the x, y coordinates of the rat from digitized video recordings (Dvorkin et al 2006). Digitized tracking data were preprocessed to remove noise (by applying appropriate filters to smooth the x, y coordinates) (Hen et al 2004), and the obtained coordinates were divided into episodes of forward locomotion (called progression) and episodes of small movements or immobility (called lingering), as described previously (Drai et al 2000;Drai and Golani 2001;Golani et al 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These doses of mCPP were chosen because they produce compulsive-like behavior in a rat model (Kontis et al 2008). (−)-Quinpirole hydrochloride was administered at a dose of 0.125 mg/kg (rather than 0.5 mg/kg; Dvorkin et al 2006;Szechtman et al 1998) to minimize the possibility that a full dose of quinpirole produces a ceiling effect on compulsive checking that would mask a potential exacerbation with mCPP cotreatment. All drugs were dissolved in 0.9 % physiological saline and administered at a volume of 1 ml/kg through a subcutaneous injection under the nape of the neck.…”
Section: Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Temporal data potentially provide information about a satiety state because within a motivational framework the existence of excessively long inter-bout intervals points to the operation of a second process; for instance, the short intra-eating intervals within a meal appear controlled by a process such as hunger while the long inter-meal intervals are said to reflect the operation of a satiety mechanism (Tolkamp et al, 1998;Tolkamp and Kyriazakis, 1999;Yeates et al, 2001). Interestingly, we reported recently that in an animal model of OCD, there exists a paucity of long intervals between bouts of checking behavior, consistent with a diminished sense of satiety (Dvorkin et al, 2006). A similar examination of the temporal dynamics of rituals shown by OCD patients seems warranted.…”
Section: An Approach To Identifying the Dysfunctional Component Or Comentioning
confidence: 95%