The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2002
DOI: 10.1006/jema.2001.0503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and implementation of the Norwegian monitoring programme for agricultural landscapes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Features of the landscape that were of high value for biodiversity, recreation and for aesthetics have often been altered or removed due to agriculture (Dramstad et al, 2002). The importance of biodiversity was realised during the United Nations Conference on the Environment and Development (UNCED) Rio Summit in 1992 and 150 countries have ratified the Convention on Biodiversity.…”
Section: Preservation Of Biodiversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Features of the landscape that were of high value for biodiversity, recreation and for aesthetics have often been altered or removed due to agriculture (Dramstad et al, 2002). The importance of biodiversity was realised during the United Nations Conference on the Environment and Development (UNCED) Rio Summit in 1992 and 150 countries have ratified the Convention on Biodiversity.…”
Section: Preservation Of Biodiversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indecisive were pensioners and participants of the age group 30-39. Life monitoring in the countryside was desirable and real within a good organization which was shown by number of examples (O'Brien, 1994; Dramstad et al, 2002) and populous and wider countries than it is Serbia.…”
Section: Results and Disscusionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toda v zadnjih desetletjih so bili ob podrobnem razmejevanju rabe in pokrovnosti zemljišč zasnovani številni koncepti monitoringa in vzorčnega ocenjevanja krajinske zgradbe, pestrosti in njenih sprememb, ki presegajo zgolj uporabo podatkov iz evidenc o rabi zemljišč (npr. Dramstad et al, 2002;Peterseil et al, 2004;Stahl et al, 2011). Z ocenjevanjem variabilnosti v rabi zemljišč smo preverili, na katerih prostorskih merilih je primerno presojati o krajinski zgradbi in oblikovati zasnovo monitoringa rabe zemljišč, ki bo upoštevala morebitne regionalne razlike na Slovenskem.…”
Section: Razprava In Sklepi Discussion and Conclusionunclassified