2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rainforest Alliance Certification of Kenyan tea farms: a contribution to sustainability or tokenism?

Abstract: of a thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Applied Science. Abstract Rainforest Alliance Certification of Kenyan Tea Farms: A Contribution to

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(218 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result of buyer requirements, the two companies investigated were audited against a variety of sustainability/social standards or codes of conduct such as Fairtrade, the Kenya Flower Council's standard, Rainforest Alliance, (which is becoming more widespread across Kenyan tea as a result of commitments by major buyers (Ochieng, et al, 2013)), and the Ethical Tea Partnership's Global Standard 3 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of buyer requirements, the two companies investigated were audited against a variety of sustainability/social standards or codes of conduct such as Fairtrade, the Kenya Flower Council's standard, Rainforest Alliance, (which is becoming more widespread across Kenyan tea as a result of commitments by major buyers (Ochieng, et al, 2013)), and the Ethical Tea Partnership's Global Standard 3 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourteen papers in addition to these sixteen only met the first two search criteria (primary, quantitative, and empirical data; and peerreview literature) but did not meet the third criterion (explicitly accounting for risk of bias). Table 4 includes the papers with low risk of bias and table S1 (available at stacks.iop.org/ERL/12/033001/mmedia) includes papers that met the first two criteria but were considered to have higher risk of bias (Bacon 2005, Bacon et al 2008, Bacon et al 2014, Elder et al 2012, Elder et al 2013, Fort and Ruben 2009b, Gockowski et al 2013, Jacobi et al 2015, Jaffee 2009, Lyngbaek et al 2001, Melo and Wolf 2005, Mendez et al 2010, Ochieng et al 2013, Philpott et al 2007, Saswattecha et al 2015, Dumont et al 2014. We evaluate results only for the 16 papers with low risk of bias, which resulted in 24 cases (each case is a unique combination (table S2).…”
Section: Identification Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, growers are starting to engage with Rainforest Alliance certification, which is becoming a more widespread requirement as a result of commitments by major buyers such as Unilever (Ochieng et al, 2013). Many tea companies also follow the Ethical Tea Partnership's code of labour practice.…”
Section: Fairtrade In Kenyamentioning
confidence: 99%