2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2013.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and evaluation of a ground-level area source analytical dispersion model to predict particulate matter concentration for different particle sizes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where q is the emission rate of the mobile source per unit length, and γ(s) is the gamma function of s. The value of u 1 is based on the field measurement, and K 1 is computed using Equation (6) used by Rao et al [35] and Nimmatoori and Kumar [36]:…”
Section: Dispersion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where q is the emission rate of the mobile source per unit length, and γ(s) is the gamma function of s. The value of u 1 is based on the field measurement, and K 1 is computed using Equation (6) used by Rao et al [35] and Nimmatoori and Kumar [36]:…”
Section: Dispersion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of is based on the measurement and is computed using the Equation (4) used by Rao et al [37]; Nimmatoori and Kumar et al [38]…”
Section: Dispersion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the above studies did not apply the discrete phase method for modeling particulate matter concentrations. The primary focus of previous studies involving particulate matter emissions from biosolid applied locations included developing analytical dispersion models and applying them for predicting particulate matter concentrations at downwind distances [17] [18] [19]. However, none of them involved numerical solutions for modeling the particulate concentrations of different size ranges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…had similar performance for particle sizes 7.5 and 10 which indicate the need for more data points for the statistical analyses. The performances of the turbulence models were compared with the particulate matter deposition (PMD) model [19] which is an analytical area-source dispersion model. The PMD incorporates dry deposition while predicting concentrations for different particle sizes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%