The 3rd International Electronic Conference on Atmospheric Sciences 2020
DOI: 10.3390/ecas2020-08154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Line Source Dispersion Model for Gaseous Pollutants by Incorporating Wind Shear near the Ground under Stable Atmospheric Conditions

Abstract: Transportation sources are a major contributor to air pollution in urban areas. The role of air quality modelling is vital in the formulation of air pollution control and management strategies. Many models have appeared in the literature to estimate near-field ground level concentrations from mobile sources moving on a highway. However, current models do not account explicitly for the effect of wind shear (magnitude) near the ground while computing the ground level concentrations near highways from mobile sour… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The surprising result is that the variables related to dispersion coefficients show very little sensitivity. This result is different than the one reported by Harsha and Kumar [16,[25][26][27] using the ASTM method and the Sensitivity-Index method. The analysis performed using Crystal Ball should be re-examined.…”
Section: Figures 5acontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The surprising result is that the variables related to dispersion coefficients show very little sensitivity. This result is different than the one reported by Harsha and Kumar [16,[25][26][27] using the ASTM method and the Sensitivity-Index method. The analysis performed using Crystal Ball should be re-examined.…”
Section: Figures 5acontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6 represents the changes in predicted concentration (also called model results) and calibration residuals for all the input variables/parameters. Note that the type of sensitivity (Type I, Type II, Type III, and Type IV) was determined for each variable/parameter depending on changes to the calibration residual values and predicted concentration values by studying the model runs [55,56]. The model runs for SLINE 1.0, varying the input variables/parameters, are plotted in Figure 6.…”
Section: Changes In Calibration Residualsmentioning
confidence: 99%