1998
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1998.tb00589.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and application of a bioenergetics model for juvenile walleye Pollock

Abstract: A bioenergetics model was parameterized for age-0 walleye pollock, Theragra chalcogramma, based on a synthesis of literature data. The sensitivity of the new parameters was tested by individual parameter perturbation (IPP) analysis. The model was applied to estimate individual and total cohort food consumption of age-0 pollock in two areas of high pollock density in the Gulf of Alaska during the summer of 1990. Total cohort consumption was compared with zooplankton biomass and production estimates for the same… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…data). On average, daily consumption of euphausiids by the capelin and age-0 walleye pollock populations in the study area was only 2.4% (± 1.6 SE, n = 18) of the standing stock, which agrees with Ciannelli et al (1998) that in the western GOA there is little evidence of widespread limitation of prey. These estimates, however, may not be generally applicable due to fluctuations in predator (Bailey et al 1996b, Dorn et al 2004) and prey (Sugimoto & Tadokoro 1997) populations, and because they do not account for consumption by other zooplanktivores, or spatial patchiness in predator and prey populations (De Robertis 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…data). On average, daily consumption of euphausiids by the capelin and age-0 walleye pollock populations in the study area was only 2.4% (± 1.6 SE, n = 18) of the standing stock, which agrees with Ciannelli et al (1998) that in the western GOA there is little evidence of widespread limitation of prey. These estimates, however, may not be generally applicable due to fluctuations in predator (Bailey et al 1996b, Dorn et al 2004) and prey (Sugimoto & Tadokoro 1997) populations, and because they do not account for consumption by other zooplanktivores, or spatial patchiness in predator and prey populations (De Robertis 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…2 & 6). For Age-0 pollock, water temperature over the slope was furthest from their 10 to 13°C thermal optimum (Ciannelli et al 1998). Furthermore, the cruise speeds of 1 to 2 body length s -1 for Age-0 walleye pollock (Ryer et al 2002) are not sufficient to maintain position in the typical 30 to 40 cm s -1 flow of the Alaskan Stream.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…(2) If forage fish grazing controls zooplankton biomass and the strength of coupling of zooplankton production to phytoplankton production, there should be an inverse relationship between the abundance of forage fish and the strength of coupling between zooplankton and phytoplankton. More information is required about the consumption of zooplankton by larval fish (e.g., Dagg et al, 1984;Hillgruber et al, 1995;Napp et al, 1996Napp et al, , 2000, juvenile pollock (Ciannelli et al, 1998;Schabetsberger et al, 2000) and other forage fish under a variety of temperature and prey-density regimes. (3) In warm regimes, the biomass of adult pollock and other predatory fish will increase, and these predators will compete with other apex predators such as pinnipeds and marine birds for forage fish, with the result that bird and pinniped populations may decline.…”
Section: The Ochmentioning
confidence: 99%